Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus in Epilepsy
- Conditions
- SurgeryPartial Epilepsy
- Interventions
- Procedure: AN-DBSDrug: Usual treatment
- Registration Number
- NCT02076698
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Brief Summary
The main objective of the study is twofold:
1. Assess the clinical efficacy of DBS on epilepsy according to their number and severity at 1 year follow up.
2. Perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Medicare at 1 and 2 years.
The study hypothesis is that thalamic DBS (neurostimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus) will decrease significantly, the frequency (potentially 50% reduction in severe crises) of the most severe seizures, in at least 50% of patients who have drug-resistant partial epilepsy; and should also improve significantly the quality of life through a gain of independence in activities of daily life, the possible recovery of functional abilities, recovery of social or professional activities.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 62
- Patient with focal or multifocal epilepsy with or without secondary generalized seizure inoperable at the time of inclusion
- Failure of pharmacological therapies (pharmacoresistant epilepsy) for over 4 years (persistent seizures despite at least two anti-epileptic treatments used at the optimal dose for at least 2 years)
- Failure of vagus nerve stimulation, defined as the persistence of crises considered debilitating after 2 years of VNS's treatment
- VNS failure in a patient treated with VNS, for less than 2 years. with stop early due to the worsening crisis
- Intelligence quotient above 55
- Have the written consent of the legal representative for patients under guardianship and minors
- Affiliation to the french social security system or equivalent
- People who signed the consent form
- Seizure frequency at least 4 crisis / month on average for at least 3 months, about 12 crisis in 3 months objectified by the neurologist during visit pre-inclusion, and confirmed by the neurologist after 3 months of Baseline during the inclusion visit
- Patient with a generalized epilepsy Immediately
- Patient with a simple partial seizures (subjective manifestations only)
- Patient with a cons-indication for MRI, a serious intercurrent disease, a progressive brain tumor
- Patient with a suicide risk of in the six months preceding the inclusion visit (score ≥ 2 on item 10 of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale)
- Patient a surgical or anesthetic cons-indication
- Patient with anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment in the long term
- Woman of childbearing potential without effective contraception, or pregnant or lactating
- People hospitalized without consent
- People deprived of freedom
- Patient currently participating in another clinical research, or who participated in a clinical study in the month preceding the pre-inclusion visit (except for any non-interventional research)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description AN-DBS AN-DBS Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the thalamus Usual treatment Usual treatment Usual treatment of epilepsy including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessment of effectiveness of thalamic DBS on seizures severity 2 years The main objective of the study is twofold : to assess the effectiveness of DBS on seizures according to their severity at 1 year follow up and to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Medicare at 1 and 2 years.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of the improvement of quality of life and overall neuropsychological impact 2 years Compare the improvement of quality of life and overall neuropsychological impact at 1 and 2 years.
Comparison the adverse effects (including depression) 2 years Compare the adverse events (special focus on depression) at 1 and 2 years.
Impact of th new therapeutic strategy on the hospital budget 2 years Determine the impact on the hospital budget for the introduction of this therapeutic strategy.
Cost-utility analysis from the perspective of Medicare 2 years Perform a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of Medicare at 1 and 2 years.
Trial Locations
- Locations (11)
University Hospital of Pellegrin
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France
University Hospital of Grenoble Michallon
🇫🇷Grenoble, France
University Hospital
🇫🇷Nancy, France
University Hospital of Pierre Wertheimer
🇫🇷Lyon, France
University Hospital of la Timone
🇫🇷Marseille, France
University Hospital of Gui de Chauliac
🇫🇷Montpellier, France
University Hospital Pasteur
🇫🇷Nice, France
Sainte Anne Hospital
🇫🇷Paris, France
University Hospital of La Pitié-Salpétrière
🇫🇷Paris, France
University Hospital of Pontchaillou
🇫🇷Rennes, France
Scroll for more (1 remaining)University Hospital of Pellegrin🇫🇷Bordeaux, France