Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03183453
NCT03183453CompletedNot Applicable

Replica Study of a Neuropsychological Treatment for Patients Who Show Spontaneous Confabulation After Acquired Brain Injury

Monica Triviño Mosquera2 sites in 1 country57 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2015Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
57
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Change in the number of correct responses

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Confabulators consistently generate false memories without intention to deceive and with great feeling of rightness. However, there is currently no known effective treatment for them. In order to fill this gap, we performed a neuropsychological treatment in two groups of confabulators: experimental vs. control (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02540772).

Now, we intend to replicate the treatment with a larger sample of confabulators and with other two control groups: non-confabulator patients with brain injury and healthy individuals

Detailed Description

The treatment consisted of some brief material that patients had to learn and recall at both immediate and delayed moments. After both recollections, patients were given feedback about their performance (errors and correct responses). Pre-treatment and post-treatment measurements were administered.

Non-confabulator patients and healthy participants performed only the pre-treatment measurement.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
35 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • The presence of spontaneous confabulations after acute brain injury, for at least three months and without clinical improvement (interfering with the patient's daily life with frequent arguments and exhaustive supervision).
  • The presence of momentary confabulations in the Spanish adaptation of Dalla Barba provoked confabulation interview.
  • Prior to injury, all patients should be completely independent for daily living.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The presence of impairment in alertness.
  • Dementia.
  • Acute confusional state.
  • A history of drug abuse.
  • Psychiatric antecedents.

Arms & Interventions

Neuropsychological treatment

Experimental

The tested treatment is a combination of neuropsychological rehabilitation procedures: learning, episodic memory recall after a delay, selective attention, inhibition of predominant responses and awareness of deficits.

Intervention: Neuropsychological treatment (Behavioral)

Non-confabulators control group

No Intervention

Non-confabulators (brain injured patients but without confabulations) in this control group only performed the pre- and post-measurements without treatment.

Healthy control group

No Intervention

Healthy participants in this control group only performed the pre- and post-measurements without treatment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in the number of correct responses

Time Frame: A first measure (pre-treatment) was recorded after the recruitment up maximum to 1 month. A second measure (post-treatment) after 3 weeks (that was the duration of the treatment).

Scores ranged from 0 (no correct answers) to 72 (12 stimuli remembered twice in each session: firstly, in a immediate recall after learning, and secondly, in a delayed recall after 10 minutes).

Change in the number of Confabulations

Time Frame: A first measure (pre-treatment) was recorded after the recruitment up maximum to 1 month. A second measure (post-treatment) after 3 weeks (that was the duration of the treatment).

The confabulations recorded were 1) guessed answers, 2) confusions in time and space, 3) a mixture of two or more stimuli presented, and 4) devised or bizarre responses. Scores ranged from 0 (no confabulations) to unlimited number of them (because devised or bizarre responses were recorded) and consisted of the sum of all the confabulations produced during the 3 sessions.

Change in the number of non-responses

Time Frame: A first measure (pre-treatment) was recorded after the recruitment up maximum to 1 month. A second measure (post-treatment) after 3 weeks (that was the duration of the treatment).

Scores ranged from 0 (no non-responses) to 72 (12 stimuli remembered twice in each session: firstly, in a immediate recall after learning, and secondly, in a delayed recall after 10 minutes).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in the number of errors in source attribution(A first measure (pre-treatment) was recorded after the recruitment up maximum to 1 month. A second measure (post-treatment) after 3 weeks (that was the duration of the treatment).)

Investigators

Sponsor
Monica Triviño Mosquera
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Monica Triviño Mosquera

Psychology PhD

San Rafael University Hospital, Granada, Spain

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials