Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Composite in Class I Cavities
- Conditions
- Tooth Diseases
- Interventions
- Device: Vertise FlowDevice: LuxaFlowDevice: Teco Adhesive
- Registration Number
- NCT03556553
- Lead Sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term clinical performance of a self-adhering flowable resin composite in comparison with a conventional flowable resin composite used with an etch\&rinse adhesive system in minimally invasive class I cavities. Twenty-five patients will receive at least one pair of class I restorations. After class I cavities were prepared they were restored either with a self-adhering flowable resin composite (VertiseFlow/Kerr-VR) or with a flowable resin composite (Luxaflow/DMG-LX) in combination with an etch\&rinse adhesive (Teco/DMG) \[according to the manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be evaluated at baseline and yearly according to FDI criteria by two evaluaters. Statistical analysis will be carried out with Pearson Chi-Square test and Cochran Q-test followed by Mc Nemar's.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 25
- having no medical or behavioral problems preventing then from attending review visits, absence of previously placed restorations,having antagonist teeth
- poor gingival health,uncontrolled, rampant caries,bruxism,removable partial dentures, xerostomia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Vertise Flow Vertise Flow Superficial Class I cavities restored with Vertise Flow LuxaFlow Teco Adhesive Superficial Class I cavities restored with LuxaFlow LuxaFlow LuxaFlow Superficial Class I cavities restored with LuxaFlow
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical performances of flowable composite resins Five years Five year results according to FDIcriteria
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method