Soft Tissue Outcomes Of Badly Broken-Down Teeth Treated With Orthodontic Extrusion Compared With Immediate Implant Placement

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Broken Teeth

• Registration Number: NCT04436094
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

Many patients suffer from tooth substance loss as a result of fracture or decay of teeth situated in the esthetic zone. This might commonly occur with car accidents, sport injuries, falls or even fistfights.

For those patients, most of the crown is lost and only the root remains, so there is no enough ferrule in order to restore the tooth with a crown.

The most common treatment for those patients is immediate single-tooth implant. However, some problems may arise such as: high treatment expenses, the need for bone augmentation, the refill of the papilla to its normal position may be questionable in some implant cases, young growing patients, apprehensive patients, dental facilities and rural areas lacking cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines.

Accordingly, orthodontic extrusion may be an alternative attempt to preserve the tooth by traction of the remaining root to create a sufficient ferrule effect to restore the tooth.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2020-06
• Study First Submitted: 2020-06-15
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-06-16
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-06-16
• Study First Posted: 2020-06-17
• Last Update Posted: 2020-06-17
• Study Start: 2020-09
• Primary Completion: 2021-09
• Study Completion: 2021-09

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 26

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients at 20-40 years old and have no history of periodontal disease. (periodontally healthy patients).
• Single rooted teeth with adjacent intact or restored neighboring teeth, more than one tooth may be included in the same arch.
• More than 1:1 crown root ratio, so that the C/R is 1:1 after extrusion and restoration.
• Presence of intact adjacent teeth.

Exclusion Criteria

• Badly broken-down teeth with active signs of infection.
• Teeth with vertical root fracture.
• Teeth with severely tapered roots..
• Diabetic patients, assessed by measuring glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Patients with an HbA1c level greater than 8 will be excluded.
• Potentially uncooperative patients who are not willing to go through the proposed interventions (patients who will refuse to undergo orthodontic treatment).
• Moderate-to-heavy daily smokers* (who report consuming at least 11 cigarettes/day).
• Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
• Psychiatric problems, emotional instability, and unrealistic esthetic demands.
• History of radiation therapy to the head and neck, or bone augmentation to implant site.
• Labial cortical bone fenestration diagnosed from CBCT.
• Bruxism.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Soft tissue outcome	12 months	Pink esthetic score: 0-1-2 scoring system, 0 being the lowest, 2 being the highest value

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Survival	12 months	Tooth and Implant survival