Computer-assisted Risk Evaluation in the Early Detection of Psychotic Disorders
- Conditions
- PreventionPsychotic Disorders
- Interventions
- Device: "pronia.ai" medical device for high risk psychosis prognosisOther: Treatment-as-usual (TAU)
- Registration Number
- NCT05813080
- Lead Sponsor
- Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
- Brief Summary
Multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) with artificial intelligence (AI)-staged early diagnostics and risk-adapted treatment (RAB) as interventional treatment arm and treatment-as-usual (TAU) as control treatment arm for patients with an increased clinical risk for psychosis.
- Detailed Description
The study is a Investigator Initiated Trial (IIT)/Other clinical trial of a class 2a medical device according to article 82 medical devices regulation of the European Union.
The aim of risk-adapted treatment (RAB) arm is to reduce the number of patients with an increased clinical risk for psychosis to actually develop a manifest psychosis.
Patients assigned to the active treatment arm will receive additional in-depth clinical diagnostics including neuropsychological testing.
The AI-supported algorithm "pronia.ai" uses information from both the individual patient data of the specialized routine diagnostics as well as from in-depth clinical diagnostics.
There are two predictions, an individual quantitative assessment of the individual risk of transition to psychosis and the individual prognosis with regard to the level of psychosocial functioning 12 months after inclusion in the study.
The therapists and patients receive a non-binding risk profile from the AI-based recommendation to adjust the treatment intensity from 16 to 24 sessions over a period of six months.
The cognitive behavioral therapy-based manual "Integrated Preventive Psychological Preventive Psychological Intervention (IPPI)" manual is used. In the treatment-as-usual arm (TAU),the patients receive referral back to the previous care system; further treatment (and additional diagnostics, if necessary) is left to the referring primary care providers.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 260
- The increased risk of psychosis includes either a symptomatic "ultra high-risk" stage of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes or the "Cognitive Disturbances" risk criterion of the Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument - Children and Youth and Adult versions
- ages 16 to 40
- Presence of a written informed consent from the patient and, if applicable, the legal guardian.
- manifest psychosis according to the definition of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (according to the PRONIA-study) (At least one P-syndrome with a rating of 6 on a daily frequency and for a period of more than one week)
- Lack of capacity to give consent (the patient lacks the capacity to consent if the individual case with regard to the specific treatment measure is excluded. Only when the physician has concrete indications that the patient's capacity to consent may be lacking, he may and must must examine it. Mental disorders (e.g. delirium, dementia, psychosis, mania, depression) or cognitive impairments can have an influence on the capacity to consent. Indications for doubts of a ability to give informed consent exist if the physician has the impression that the patient is not able to understand the provided patient information and is not able to reproduce essential information about the study in his or her own words and is not aware of the possible consequences of the proposed measures
- Severe suicidality during the recruitment phase (CDSS items 8 ≥2)
- A current or past neurological disease of the brain.
- a current or past known somatic disease that potentially affects the structure or function of the brain
- Antipsychotic medication in the indication treatment of psychotic symptoms for >30 days (cumulative number of days) at or above the starting dose for psychosis according to the current German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN) S3 guidelines.
- an antipsychotic medication in the indication treatment of psychotic symptoms in the 3 months prior to the initial examination (regardless of the duration of use) at or above the starting dose for psychosis according to the current DGPPN S3 guidelines
- An inadequate level of hearing for neurocognitive testing
- a current or past head trauma with unconsciousness (>5 min).
- a current or past alcohol dependence (ICD-10 F10.x)
- A current polytoxicomania (multiple substance dependence) or polytoxicomania in the past 6 months (ICD-10 F19.x)
- Presence of medical reasons that contraindicate performance of an MRI
- Insufficient language skills to understand the indication and the purpose of the intended examinations and interventions
- stationary accommodation against the patient's will
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CARE interventional treatment "pronia.ai" medical device for high risk psychosis prognosis AI-computerassisted prognosis of high risk psychosis profile and adapted study-specific therapy taking place in early-recognition centers. Standard of Care Control arm Treatment-as-usual (TAU) Treatment as usual (TAU) patient will receive their usual treatment from their local physicians and therapeutic personnel.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) 12-month after inclusion Presence of psychotic syndrome (POPS) criteria as modified according to the "PRONIA" study, resulting in a score of 0= "no psychosis" or 1= "psychosis"
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Social and occupational assessment scale SOFAS 12-month after inclusion Scores from 0-100, a higher score indicates better social functioning.
Global Functioning Role Scale (GF:R) 12-month after inclusion Scores from 1-10, a higher score indicates better functioning
Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI) 12-month after inclusion Consisting of 5-subscales, comprising of 29 items in total using response formats varying from 4-point Likert scales (1='not at all', 4='very often') to 5-point Likert scales (1='never', 5='very often'), assessing self-stigma in terms of alienation, adoption of stereotypes, experiences of discrimination, social withdrawal and stigma resistance.
Stigma-Stress-Scale 12-month after inclusion two dimensions are assessed, 8 items are rated on a 5-point Likert-scale from "strongly disagree" to "totally agree", capturing self-assessed-stigma stress.
Global Functioning Social Scale (GF:S) 12-month after inclusion Scores from 1-10, a higher score indicates better global functioning
Self-Identification of Mental Illness Scale (SELF-I) 12-month after inclusion 5-point Likert-scale ranging from 1 = "not true at all" to 5 = " is completely true", capturing the degree of self-identification with mental illnesses.
Numeracy Scale 12-month after inclusion A single score from 0 to 100% indicating the patient self-estimated amount of belief in risk for developing psychosis within the next 12 months.
Risk Recall Scale 12-month after inclusion A score from 1 = "much lower" to 5 "much higher" indicating the risk for developing psychosis compared to a healthy peer.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory (CSSRI-EU) 12-month after inclusion Changes in service use are measured with a semi-structured interview to assess social and demographic data, accommodation data, detailed information regarding treatment, professional visits and social and health service utilization for estimating healthcare costs. Additionally, the CSSRI systematically records the use of psychiatric, medical, psycho-social and rehabilitative health services (direct costs) and productivity losses (indirect costs) and therefore completely covers the costs of the disease from an economic perspective.
Secrecy and disclosure-related distress - scale 12-month after inclusion 7-point single-item-scale ranging from 1 = " not at all" to 7 = "very much", measuring the degree of subjective stress.
Psychosis own health-concern single score 12-month after inclusion 5-point Likert-scale ranging from 1 = "not at all" to 5 = "strong", capturing the degree of self-concern in terms of getting a psychosis one day.
Risk Perception Scale 12-month after inclusion A score from 1 =no risk" to 7 = "absolutely certain" indicating the risk for developing psychosis.
Brief Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Scale (BMLSS) 12-month after inclusion Score from 0-126, a higher score indicates a higher amount of satisfaction.
Coming-Out with Mental Illness Scale (COMIS) 12-month after inclusion consisting of two subscales with 7 and 14 items, each with 7-step Likert-scale ranging from 1 = "do not agree at all" to 7 = " totally agree", capturing a potential change of strategies for dealing with mental illness.
Coping (Ten-Flex) 12-month after inclusion Patient self-estimation of likelihood for developing psychosis given on a visual analogue scale (VAS) indicating "I will not develop psychosis in the next 12 months" on the left side of the scale up to "I will definitely develop psychosis in the next 12 months" on the right side of the scale.
Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) 12-month after inclusion patient questionnaire consisting of two sub-scores. a) score from 0-10 whereas a higher score indicates greater impairment; b) score from 0-100 whereas a higher score indicates better current health status to measure the quality of Life.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ZUF-8) 12-month after inclusion 8 Items with a total score of 8-32, ranging from 4 = "very satisfied" to 1="fairly satisfied" whereas a higher score indicates higher patient satisfaction.
Secrecy-Symptoms Scale 12-month after inclusion Five questions (either yes or no) asking who the patient has told about the risk for developing psychosis
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (21)
ZfP Reichenau - Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Universität Konstanz
🇩🇪Konstanz, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Universität Tübingen
🇩🇪Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Zentrum für psychische Gesundheit, U11iversitätsklinikum Würzburg
🇩🇪Würzburg, Bayern, Germany
Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit
🇩🇪Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik der Universität Augsburg
🇩🇪Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany
Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, RWTH Universität Aachen
🇩🇪Aachen, NRW, Germany
KJPP LVR-Klinik Bonn
🇩🇪Bonn, NRW, Germany
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
🇩🇪Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
Otto-von-Guericke- Universität Magdeburg
🇩🇪Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany
UKD Dresden, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
🇩🇪Dresden, Sachsen, Germany
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf {UKE)
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany
Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany
Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
🇩🇪München, Bayern, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Bonn Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
🇩🇪Bonn, NRW, Germany
Institut für Translationale Psychiatrie
🇩🇪Münster, NRW, Germany
Rheinhessen Fachklinik Alzey
🇩🇪Alzey, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum der Ruhr--Universität Bochum, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin
🇩🇪Bochum, NRW, Germany
Zentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie (ZIP) und Fachklinik für Junges Leben (JuLe) Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie
🇩🇪Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany
Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklin-ik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters
🇩🇪Köln, NRW, Germany
Zentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie Kiel
🇩🇪Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany