Effectiveness of Rubber Dam Isolation Versus Cotton Roll Isolation on Bonded Fissure Sealant Retention
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Dental Caries in ChildrenDental LeakageDental Caries on Pit and Fissure Surface
- Interventions
- Device: Dental Cotton RollDevice: Rubber Dam Set
- Registration Number
- NCT03886727
- Lead Sponsor
- Zafer Cavit Cehreli, DDS, PhD
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical retention of bonded fissure sealants placed under rubber dam isolation and cotton roll isolation.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
- Teeth having a clinical indication of sealing with bonded resin pit and fissure sealants
- Patients with four fully-erupted permanent molars, with unstained, caries-free and unsealed pit and fissures
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients having incipient carious lesions, fewer erupted molars or teeth without pits on buccal/palatal surfaces.
- Patients with systemic diseases.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cotton Roll Dental Cotton Roll Isolation of quadrant using cotton rolls Rubber Dam Rubber Dam Set Isolation of single tooth using rubber dam
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The US Public Health Service criteria for retention of sealants 12 months Alpha: No Loss of sealant, Bravo: Partial Loss of Sealant, Charlie: Total loss of sealant
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The US Public Health Service criteria for secondary caries on sealants 12 months Alpha: Charlie: There is no clinical diagnosis of caries. Charlie: There is clinical diagnosis of caries
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
LSU School of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry
🇺🇸New Orleans, Louisiana, United States