NCT03886727
Unknown
Not Applicable
Clinical Retention of Bonded Resin Sealants Placed With Rubber Dam Versus Cotton Roll Isolation
Zafer Cavit Cehreli, DDS, PhD1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentFebruary 1, 2020
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dental Caries in Children
- Sponsor
- Zafer Cavit Cehreli, DDS, PhD
- Enrollment
- 50
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- The US Public Health Service criteria for retention of sealants
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical retention of bonded fissure sealants placed under rubber dam isolation and cotton roll isolation.
Investigators
Zafer Cavit Cehreli, DDS, PhD
Clinical Professor
Hacettepe University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Teeth having a clinical indication of sealing with bonded resin pit and fissure sealants
- •Patients with four fully-erupted permanent molars, with unstained, caries-free and unsealed pit and fissures
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients having incipient carious lesions, fewer erupted molars or teeth without pits on buccal/palatal surfaces.
- •Patients with systemic diseases.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
The US Public Health Service criteria for retention of sealants
Time Frame: 12 months
Alpha: No Loss of sealant, Bravo: Partial Loss of Sealant, Charlie: Total loss of sealant
Secondary Outcomes
- The US Public Health Service criteria for secondary caries on sealants(12 months)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Effectiveness of Fissure Sealants Bonded With Different Universal AdhesivesDental Caries on Pit and Fissure SurfaceNCT02897089Hacettepe University100
Unknown
Phase 2
Fissure Sealant Retention TrialFissure Sealant LossNCT00873990Aga Khan University93
Completed
Not Applicable
Clinical Follow Up of a Fissure Sealant Placed With Different Adhesive Protocols: 2-Year Randomized Split Mouth StudyFissure Sealant LossCariesNCT02998814Hacettepe University24
Completed
Phase 3
Clinical retention comparison of fissure sealant versus flowable composite in type I adhesive conservative restorationsIRCT20210609051529N1Tabriz University of Medical Sciences55
Recruiting
Not Applicable
The Effect of an Adhesive System on the Retention and Caries Prevention for Fissure Sealants in Permanent MolarsDental CariesFissure SealantNCT06608563University of Dublin, Trinity College100