跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/11/097631
CTRI/2025/11/097631尚未招募4 期

To compare the efficacy of modified thenar eminence technique versus C-E technique of mask ventilation in unconscious apnoeic patients during induction of general anaesthesia in edentulous patients – a prospective randomized cross-over study.

Smt. Bhikiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2025年11月29日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

Bag-mask ventilation (BMV) is a vital airway management skill during induction of general anesthesia, as unconscious apneic patients depend entirely on effective ventilation. Its success relies on achieving a good mask seal and maintaining airway patency, which can be difficult in certain patient groups. The conventional one-handed C-E technique is widely used but often leads to mask leak or obstruction. Two-handed methods, especially the thenar eminence and modified thenar eminence techniques, offer better seal and jaw thrust. Given the 1–5% incidence of difficult mask ventilation and its serious complications, this study compares the efficacy of the modified thenar eminence versus C-E technique.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
60.00 Year(s) 至 90.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients willing to participate voluntarily and sign informed consent.
  • Male or female edentulous patients aged more than 60 years.
  • Patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II.
  • Patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia.
  • BMI between 18-30 kg/m².

排除标准

  • Patient not giving consent Age less than 60 years ASA grade 3,4,5.

研究者

发起方
Smt. Bhikiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre
申办方类型
Private medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr NEVIL BALAR

Smt.Bhikiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验