To compare the efficacy of modified thenar eminence technique versus C-E technique of mask ventilation in unconscious apnoeic patients during induction of general anaesthesia in edentulous patients – a prospective randomized cross-over study.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
Bag-mask ventilation (BMV) is a vital airway management skill during induction of general anesthesia, as unconscious apneic patients depend entirely on effective ventilation. Its success relies on achieving a good mask seal and maintaining airway patency, which can be difficult in certain patient groups. The conventional one-handed C-E technique is widely used but often leads to mask leak or obstruction. Two-handed methods, especially the thenar eminence and modified thenar eminence techniques, offer better seal and jaw thrust. Given the 1–5% incidence of difficult mask ventilation and its serious complications, this study compares the efficacy of the modified thenar eminence versus C-E technique.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 60.00 Year(s) 至 90.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients willing to participate voluntarily and sign informed consent.
- •Male or female edentulous patients aged more than 60 years.
- •Patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II.
- •Patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia.
- •BMI between 18-30 kg/m².
排除标准
- •Patient not giving consent Age less than 60 years ASA grade 3,4,5.
研究者
Dr NEVIL BALAR
Smt.Bhikiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre
