Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01971918
NCT01971918
Terminated
Phase 4

Comparative Analysis of Two Therapeutic Strategies: "Early Switch" Versus "Therapeutic Intensification" in Patients With Spondyloarthritis Treated With Anti-tnf Biologics, in Case of Secondary Treatment Failure Suspicion.

University Hospital, Rouen7 sites in 1 country8 target enrollmentMay 2014

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Spondyloarthritis
Sponsor
University Hospital, Rouen
Enrollment
8
Locations
7
Primary Endpoint
Variation of ASDAS between inclusion and 24 weeks of treatment
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate two therapeutic strategies: "early switch" or "therapeutic intensification" in patients with spondyloarthritis in case of secondary treatment failure suspicion to a first monoclonal antibodies anti-TNF definite by increase of ASDAS and positivity to ADAb.

Patients and Methods:

Multicentric randomized prospective study. Duration of inclusion 30 months. Duration of follow-up 24 months. 104 patients with spondyloarthritis treated with infliximab or adalimumab will be included if their ADAb dosage is positive, and they will be randomized (1:1) in two groups : "early switch" where treatment will be change to another anti-TNF, or "therapeutic intensification" where interval between two injections will be shortened. Patients will be evaluated clinically (ASDAS) and biologically (ADAb) at 12 weeks then at 24 weeks. Principal outcome will be the variation of ASDAS between baseline and end of the study. Number of patients to be included has been determined statistically from a preliminary study (power >98% for ASDAS variation of 20% on week 24).

Expected results:

On week 24, we expect a better response and a greater proportion of patients in remission in the "early switch" arm compare to the "therapeutic intensification" arm.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2014
End Date
April 2017
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
University Hospital, Rouen
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Spondyloarthritis positive for the ASAS criteria, treated with a first biologic : infliximab ( 5mg/kg intravenously every 8 weeks) or adalimumab (40mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks)
  • Active spondyloarthritis definite by ASDAS-CRP \> 2.1 at two successive evaluations while patient was previously responder (ASDAS\<2.1 at least once in the 6th months after beginning of treatment)
  • Positivity to anti-drug antibodies (ADAb)
  • Consent of the patient
  • No contra-indication to another anti-tnf biologic
  • affiliation to health insurance
  • woman of childbearing age must use an appropriate mean of contraception

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • contra-indication to anti-tnf biologic
  • patient with known hypersensitivity to any of the excipients
  • Severe and uncontrolled opportunistic infection , includins septicemia, tuberculosis, abcess and opportunistic infection
  • Evolutive infection, including chronic or localised infection
  • Patient with moderate to severe heart failure (NYHA class III/IV)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Variation of ASDAS between inclusion and 24 weeks of treatment

Time Frame: Week 24

ASDAS will be measured at week 24 and will be compared to day 1

Secondary Outcomes

  • Frequency of patients with ASDAS < 2.1(Week 24)

Study Sites (7)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison of two preemptive treatment strategies of panitumumab mediated skin toxicity and assessment of quality of life in patients with Ras-wildtype colorectal cancer
EUCTR2010-022938-85-DEAIO-Studien-gGmbH
Completed
Phase 4
Early Versus Delayed Switch in Medication in Patients With Major Depressive DisorderMajor Depressive Disorder
NCT00810069Eli Lilly and Company840
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Comparación de dos estrategias de tratamiento diferentes en pacientes con trastorno depresivo mayor en tratamiento con escitalopram que no presentan mejoría: Estrategia de intervención temprana versus estrategia de intervención tardíaComparison of Two Different Treatment Strategies in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Not Exhibiting Improvement on Escitalopram Treatment: Early vs. Delayed Intervention Strategy - HMGDTrastorno depresivo mayorMedDRA version: 9.1Level: LLTClassification code 10025453Term: Major depressive disorder NOS
EUCTR2008-002319-42-ESilly S.A.1,160
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison of Two Different Treatment Strategies in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Not Exhibiting Improvement on Escitalopram Treatment: Early vs. Delayed Intervention Strategy - HMGDMajor depressive disorderMedDRA version: 9.1Level: LLTClassification code 10025453Term: Major depressive disorder NOS
EUCTR2008-002319-42-SEEli Lilly and Company Limited1,160
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison of Two Different Treatment Strategies in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Not Exhibiting Improvement on Escitalopram Treatment: Early vs. Delayed Intervention Strategy - HMGDMajor depressive disorderMedDRA version: 9.1Level: LLTClassification code 10025453Term: Major depressive disorder NOS
EUCTR2008-002319-42-SIEli Lilly and Company Limited1,160