Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01645202
NCT01645202CompletedNot Applicable

A Randomized Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Medtronic CoreValve Versus Edwards SAPIEN XT (The CHOICE Trial)

Segeberger Kliniken GmbH2 sites in 1 country241 target enrollmentStarted: March 2012Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
241
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
'Device success' as recently defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium

Study Overview

Brief Summary

A randomized controlled multicenter study comparing the acute hemodynamic performance of the Edwards Sapien XT and the Medtronic CoreValve transcatheter heart valves in high risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Detailed Description

Study design: randomized open-label multicenter

Primary endpoint:

'Device success' as recently defined by VARC which is a 'technical' composite endpoint including:

  1. Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device and successful retrieval of the delivery system,
  2. Correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location,
  3. Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (aortic valve area > 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient < 20 mmHg or peak velocity < 3 m/s, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR) and
  4. Only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location.

Secondary endpoints:

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
75 Years to — (Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Severe aortic valve stenosis defined as aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 1cm2 or 0.6 cm2/m2
  • Presence of clinical symptoms defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class ≥ 2
  • Age > 75 years and/or Logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20% and/or STS risk score ≥ 10% and/or contraindication to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (porcelain aorta, previous chest radiation, chest deformation)
  • Native aortic valve annulus measuring 20-25 mm
  • Patients must be suitable for a transfemoral vascular access
  • The patient signing a written informed consent prior to intervention

Exclusion Criteria

  • Life expectancy < 12 months due to co-morbid conditions
  • Native aortic valve annulus < 20 mm and > 25 mm (this could be amended if further valve sizes for the transfemoral approach become available for both prostheses during the study period)
  • Pre-existing aortic bioprosthesis
  • Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability
  • History of, or active endocarditis
  • Contraindications for a transfemoral access
  • Active peptic ulcer or upper gastro-intestinal bleeding within the prior 3 months.
  • Hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin or clopidogrel
  • Active infection requiring antibiotic treatment
  • An elective surgical procedure is planned that would necessitate interruption of thienopyridines during the first 3 months post-enrolment
  • Patients actively participating in another drug or device investigational study and have not yet completed the primary endpoint follow-up period

Arms & Interventions

TAVI with Edwards Sapien XT valve

Active Comparator

Intervention: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) (Procedure)

TAVI with Medtronic CoreValve

Active Comparator

Intervention: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

'Device success' as recently defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium

Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure

Device success is a 'technical' composite endpoint including successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device and successful retrieval of the delivery system, correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location, intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (aortic valve area \> 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient \< 20 mmHg or peak velocity \< 3 m/s, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR) and only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location.

Secondary Outcomes

  • VARC-defined combined safety endpoint(30 days)
  • VARC-defined combined efficacy endpoint(1 year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

A Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves... | Clinical Trial