跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01645202
NCT01645202已完成不适用

A Randomized Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Medtronic CoreValve Versus Edwards SAPIEN XT (The CHOICE Trial)

Segeberger Kliniken GmbH1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 241 人开始时间: 2012年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
241
试验地点
1
主要终点
'Device success' as recently defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium

研究概览

简要总结

A randomized controlled multicenter study comparing the acute hemodynamic performance of the Edwards Sapien XT and the Medtronic CoreValve transcatheter heart valves in high risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

详细描述

Study design: randomized open-label multicenter

Primary endpoint:

'Device success' as recently defined by VARC which is a 'technical' composite endpoint including:

  1. Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device and successful retrieval of the delivery system,
  2. Correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location,
  3. Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (aortic valve area > 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient < 20 mmHg or peak velocity < 3 m/s, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR) and
  4. Only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location.

Secondary endpoints:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
75 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Severe aortic valve stenosis defined as aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 1cm2 or 0.6 cm2/m2
  • •Presence of clinical symptoms defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class ≥ 2
  • •Age > 75 years and/or Logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20% and/or STS risk score ≥ 10% and/or contraindication to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (porcelain aorta, previous chest radiation, chest deformation)
  • •Native aortic valve annulus measuring 20-25 mm
  • •Patients must be suitable for a transfemoral vascular access
  • •The patient signing a written informed consent prior to intervention

排除标准

  • •Life expectancy < 12 months due to co-morbid conditions
  • •Native aortic valve annulus < 20 mm and > 25 mm (this could be amended if further valve sizes for the transfemoral approach become available for both prostheses during the study period)
  • •Pre-existing aortic bioprosthesis
  • •Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability
  • •History of, or active endocarditis
  • •Contraindications for a transfemoral access
  • •Active peptic ulcer or upper gastro-intestinal bleeding within the prior 3 months.
  • •Hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin or clopidogrel
  • •Active infection requiring antibiotic treatment
  • •An elective surgical procedure is planned that would necessitate interruption of thienopyridines during the first 3 months post-enrolment
  • •Patients actively participating in another drug or device investigational study and have not yet completed the primary endpoint follow-up period

研究组 & 干预措施

TAVI with Edwards Sapien XT valve

Active Comparator

干预措施: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) (Procedure)

TAVI with Medtronic CoreValve

Active Comparator

干预措施: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

'Device success' as recently defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium

时间窗: Immediately after the procedure

Device success is a 'technical' composite endpoint including successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device and successful retrieval of the delivery system, correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location, intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (aortic valve area \> 1.2 cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient \< 20 mmHg or peak velocity \< 3 m/s, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve AR) and only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location.

次要结局

  • VARC-defined combined safety endpoint(30 days)
  • VARC-defined combined efficacy endpoint(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验