Leuven Interactive Scheme for hearingTraining Evaluation, and Audiological Rehabilitation
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Hearing Disability
- Sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Enrollment
- 90
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Speech in noise intelligibility
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
It is believed that persons with hearing impairment benefit from auditory rehabilitation (AR), i.e. regular assessment and training of their listening skills. However, the efficacy of auditory rehabilitation has not been investigated before. In Leuven (Belgium) an e-health app has been developed that enables performance assessment, listening skills training, and counselling for persons with hearing impairment. Currently, an RCT is prepared to evaluate the different modules in persons with hearing impairment. The experimental group will receive auditory rehabilitation training modules, and a control group will either receive training tasks that are NOT believed to transfer to improved listening skills or will not receive any training (passive control).
- Do participants improve on the trained tasks in the LUISTER AR scheme and does this improvement transfer to an improvement in speech perception in noise (primary outcome), executive functioning and/or quality of life (secondary outcomes)?
- Does training with the LUISTER AR scheme provide more benefit on primary and secondary outcomes than a placebo program (active control group) or no training (passive control group)?
- Can improvement in speech in noise perception, obtained with the LUISTER AR scheme, be consolidated until 6 months after training has stopped?
- Are certain user-specific or training-specific aspects correlated to improvement on task-specific learning as well as near- and far transfer
Detailed Description
Goals of the study: To determine an optimal, personalized AR scheme (considering age, degree of HI) and possible interacting factors (e.g., training time, type of errors) To investigate transfer of auditory and auditory-cognitive training to listening skills in everyday life To develop evidence-based guidelines for clinical AR A study to assess the efficacy in CI users will start with baseline assessment (speech in noise understanding, LIST sentences and cognitive tests (executive functioning, important for listening skills). This will be followed by 8 weeks of training, an intermediate assessment moment, again 8 weeks of training, and a final evaluation moment. After 6 months follow-up evaluation to investigate retention. This study is comprised of an active training group and an active control group. A study to assess the efficacy in HA users will start with baseline assessment (speech in noise understanding, LIST sentences and cognitive tests (executive functioning, important for listening skills). This will be followed by 6 weeks of training, an intermediate (online) assessment moment, again 6 weeks of training, and a final evaluation moment.
Investigators
Astrid Van Wieringen, PhD
Professor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •hearing impaired
- •sufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
Exclusion Criteria
- •cognitively impaired
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Speech in noise intelligibility
Time Frame: Change at 16 wks compared to baseline
LIST sentences presented in speech-weighted noise. Participants are required to repeat sentences in noise. The Leuven Intelligibility Sentences Test (LIST, (van Wieringen \& Wouters, 2008)) was specifically designed for speech perception in noise assessment in CI users. The test has a high test-retest reliability and a steep slope making it very sensitive to small improvements in performance. An improvement of 2dB results in a clinically relevant improvement in speech. discrimination in noise. Therefore, the primary endpoint to validate the LUISTER AR scheme will be an improvement of 2dB on speech discrimination in noise.
Secondary Outcomes
- Executive functioning: task switching(16 weeks, + 6 months)
- Executive functioning updating(16 weeks, + 6 months)
- Self-reported measure(0 weeks, for baseline)
- Executive functioning inhibition(16 weeks, + 6 months)
- Transfer of change in speech in noise intelligibility(Change at 6 months post intervention compared to primary outcome)
- Fluid intelligence(0 weeks, for baseline)