Safety and Efficacy of Brimonidine Intravitreal Implant in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Due to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- Conditions
- Macular Degeneration
- Interventions
- Drug: 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate ImplantDrug: 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate ImplantOther: Sham (no implant)
- Registration Number
- NCT00658619
- Lead Sponsor
- Allergan
- Brief Summary
Stage 1 is a patient-masked, dose-escalation, safety evaluation of brimonidine intravitreal implant. Patients will receive implant in one eye and "sham" treatment (meaning no treatment) in the fellow eye. Stage 2 will begin after 1 month of safety has been evaluated for Stage 1. Stage 2 is a randomized, double-masked, dose-response, sham-controlled evaluation of the safety and efficacy of brimonidine intravitreal implant in patients with geographic atrophy from age-related macular degeneration. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 119
- Geographic atrophy in both eyes due to age-related macular degeneration
- Visual acuity between 20/40 to 20/320
- Known allergy to brimonidine
- Uncontrolled systemic disease or infection of the eye
- Recent eye surgery or injections in the eye
- Female patients who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1 Sham (no implant) Stage 1: 200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6. 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1: 400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6. 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1: 200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6. 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2 Sham (no implant) Stage 2: 200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6. 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1 Sham (no implant) Stage 1: 400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6. 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2 Sham (no implant) Stage 2: 400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6. 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2: 400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6. 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2: 200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6. Sham (no implant) Stage 2 Sham (no implant) Stage 2: sham in both eyes on Day 1 and Month 6.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study Eye Baseline, Month 12 Change from baseline in size of geographic atrophy lesion area in the study eye is based on fundus photography as read by an independent Reading Center. Photographs are taken with a specialized microscope with an attached camera to photograph the interior of the eye, including the retina and optic disc. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of geographic atrophy lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Data are reported in disc area where 1 disc area = 1.767 millimeters squared (mm\^2).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye Baseline, 24 Months BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study Eye Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 18, Month 24 Change from baseline in size of geographic atrophy lesion area in the study eye is based on fundus photography as read by an independent Reading Center. Photographs are taken with a specialized microscope with an attached camera to photograph the interior of the eye, including the retina and optic disc. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of geographic atrophy lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Data are reported in disc area where 1 disc area = 1.767 millimeters squared (mm\^2).
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study Eye Baseline, 24 Months Change from baseline in contrast sensitivity in the study eye is measured using a Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart at 1 meter. The contrast sensitivity chart contains letters that are darkest at the top and then get progressively lighter. Scores range from 0 to 48 and are based on the number of letters read correctly. A negative change from baseline indicates a worsening in contrast sensitivity and a positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study Eye Baseline, 24 Months Change from baseline in reading speed in the study eye is assessed using modified Bailey-Lovie word charts. Patients read the chart for 2 minutes and the numbers of words read correctly per minute are totaled. An increase in the number of words read correctly indicates an improvement and a decrease in the number of words read correctly indicates a worsening.