NCT02458534
Completed
Not Applicable
The Comparison of Mcgrath Mac, C-MAC, and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Novice Users: a Manikin Study
ConditionsHealthy
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Sponsor
- Yonsei University
- Enrollment
- 39
- Primary Endpoint
- time to intubation
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope is superior when compared to the C-MAC videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for novice users in manikin.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Medical students
Exclusion Criteria
- •wrist disease excluded.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
time to intubation
Time Frame: within 3 minutes after the insertion of the laryngoscope into the mouth of the manikin
Time to intubation is defined as the time from the insertion of the laryngoscope into the mouth of the manikin to the confirmation of the chest movement of the manikin.
Secondary Outcomes
- success rate of the first intubation attempt(Within 3 minutes after the insertion of the laryngoscope into the mouth of the manikin)
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison of McGrath MAC Versus C-MAC Videolaryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese PatientsDifficult IntubationMorbid ObesityVideolaryngoscopyNCT03657927Inonu University80
Completed
Not Applicable
Evaluation of McGrath® MAC Video LaryngoscopeIntubation; DifficultNCT02051400Hanyang University39
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of conventional laryngoscope with video laryngoscope.Health Condition 1: null- Those requiring surgeryCTRI/2018/05/014150Gurleen Kaur
Completed
Phase 4
Effects of Videolaryngoscope on Intraocular PressureIntubation ComplicationNCT02474394Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University80
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of C-MAC and Mc-GRATH laryngoscopes for intubation in COVID scenario.CTRI/2020/06/025927All India Institute of Medical Sciences