MedPath

Stability and Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants Placed at Crestal Versus Subcrestal Level in Controlled Type Two Diabetic Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dental Implant
Diabetes
Interventions
Procedure: Implants placed at bone crest
Procedure: Implants placed 1mm Subcrestally
Registration Number
NCT05125445
Lead Sponsor
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to assess clinically the peri implant tissues, the radiological marginal bone loss and the stability around implants placed at the crestal versus the subcrestal level in type 2 controlled diabetic patients using cone beam computed tomography

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
22
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Crestally positioned implantsImplants placed at bone crest-
Subcrestally positioned implantsImplants placed 1mm Subcrestally-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
change in Implant stabilityat baseline and 3 months

Implant stability will be measured again by Osstell at 3 different directions (buccal, mesial and distal) at the time of implant loading (after 3 months from implant placement).

change in margianl bone levelat baseline, 3rd and 6th months

CBCT will be done Marginal bone loss in all aspects (mesial, distal buccal and lingual) The difference in distance from bone crest to apical end of the implant will be assessed at each follow up period then the mean will be calculated for mesial and distal and also for buccal and lingual.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath