Evaluation of Success in Neuraxial Block Placement Between Using Palpation of Landmark Versus Pocket-Size Handheld Ultrasound (U/S) Method
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 128
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Time to Success of Neuraxial Block Placement
研究概览
简要总结
We hypothesize that the Rivanna Accuro or similar U/S device would reduce time to success of identifying epidural and/or intrathecal spaces as compared to conventional palpation method.
详细描述
Administration of (neuraxial blocks) spinal and epidural blocks is commonly achieved by first palpating the landmarks for midline with spinous process and iliac crest for L3-4-5 intervertebral spaces. With an epidural block, a loss of resistance in a pressurized syringe is used to incrementally advance the epidural needle until identification of epidural space with loss of resistance in the pressurized syringe. With a spinal block, the spinal needle is advanced incrementally until a noted "feel" of dural puncture together with return of spinal fluid via the spinal needle. The palpation technique and somewhat "blind" technique to identify the spinal and epidural spaces become more difficult and less reliable particularly with the increasing prevalence of the morbid and super-morbid obese patients. Ultrasound devices have become common and successful with non-neuraxial blocks and venous accesses, both involving mostly non-bony, soft tissues. Application of conventional ultrasound for neuraxial blocks has been limited by its bulkiness, limited imaging for bony structures and lack of automated artificial intelligent algorithm for pattern recognition. Recent technological advancement has addressed the aforementioned limitations. Rivanna Accuro is one such device that has gained FDA approval and may have helped in addressing some of these issues. It is a handheld (pocket size) U/S device with real time pattern recognition for bony structures such as the spine while providing 3-D overlay for recognition of the midline spinous process and epidural spaces and distance. The investigators hypothesize that the Rivanna Accuro or similar U/S device would reduce time to success of identifying epidural and/or intrathecal spaces as compared to conventional palpation method. We will compare placement of neuraxial block between palpation method versus ultrasound method. We will compare placement of spinal block for cesarean delivery with palpation versus with ultrasound method, and then comparing placement of neuraxial analgeisa block (combined spinal epidural analgesia) for labor analgesia with palpation versus ultrasound method.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Female requesting analgesia for delivery, be it via vaginal or cesarean delivery
排除标准
- •Allergy to ultrasound gel
- •Contraindication to receiving neuraxial analgesia
- •Under the age of 18
结局指标
主要结局
Time to Success of Neuraxial Block Placement
时间窗: 60-225 seconds
Time it takes to successfully identify the epidural space (defined by loss of resistance) for the groups of subjects receiving labor neuraxial analgesia; and spinal fluid flow into the hub of spinal needle for the groups of subjects receiving cesarean spinal anesthetic - length of time (in minutes) it takes to get block placed, between palpation and ultrasound groups among patients with labor neuraxial analgesia patients and cesarean spinal anesthetic, respectively and spinal fluid flow with spinal needle - length of time (in seconds) it takes to get block placed, between the 2 groups.
次要结局
- Total Number of Needle Passes Per Placement(1 hour)
- Needle Passing Success at First Attempt(1 hour)
