Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 50
- 主要终点
- Modified Ryge Criteria
研究概览
简要总结
Background: This 3-year clinical trial compared the performance and post-operative sensitivity of a posterior resin composite with that of bonded-amalgam in large sized cavities. Additionally, it was evaluated whether resin composite could be an alternative for bonded amalgam.
Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients in need of at least two posterior restorations were recruited. Authors randomly assigned one half of the restorations to receive bonded-amalgam and the other half to composite restorations. Forty bonded-amalgams and composites were evaluated for their performance on modified Ryge criteria and post-operative sensitivity using VAS for 36-months.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •To be included, the teeth to be restored had to:
- •be asymptomatic
- •have occlusal and adjacent teeth in contact
- •have cavity sizes exceeding the one-third of the bucco-lingual distance between cusp tips -
排除标准
- •Patients with periodontitis, poor oral hygiene, bruxism or a history of allergic reactions to any of the materials
结局指标
主要结局
Modified Ryge Criteria
时间窗: 3 years
次要结局
未报告次要终点
