Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress: a Randomized Controlled Trial (CEDD Trial)
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Diabetes Distress
- Sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Enrollment
- 19
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Diabetes distress score
- Status
- Terminated
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Diabetes distress (DD) is a negative emotional reaction to a diagnosis of diabetes and concerns about the burden of managing diabetes, the risk of complications, and inadequate support system. DD is common among people with diabetes and is strongly associated with poor diabetes self-care and poor diabetes control. Reducing DD should thus be an important component of diabetes management. In line with the growing evidence, the American Diabetes Association now recommends that providers "routinely monitor people with diabetes for diabetes distress, particularly when treatment targets are not met". Despite increased recognition of the need to manage DD, interventions that are both feasible and effective for reducing DD in routine care settings are not yet known. A pilot study showed that health coaching (HC) has some efficacy in addressing DD but no adequately powered study has implemented a pragmatic research design capable of assessing the real-world effectiveness of HC in reducing DD.
This study seeks to assess whether HC effectively reduces DD among primary care patients with diabetes, and whether HC is more effective than an educational program targeting DD. The investigators hypothesize that over a 6-month period, patients with poorly controlled diabetes and DD who enroll in and complete at least five HC sessions will achieve higher and clinically significant reductions in DD and HbA1c, and greater compliance with diabetes self-care recommendations than those who receive only an educational program targeting DD as part of usual diabetes care.
The two-arm randomized controlled trial for patients with poorly-controlled diabetes is taking place at an academic family medicine practice in Houston, Texas. Both arms will receive usual care, which includes education about DD. In addition, the intervention arm will receive eight HC sessions over a five-month period. The primary outcome measure is reduction in DD over a six month period. Additional outcome measures include changes in glycemic control (HbA1C) and self-care practices (medication adherence, dietary, and physical activity behaviors). The study will also measure satisfaction and willingness-to-pay for HC to determine the extent to which HC, if effective for reducing DD, can be operationalized in similar healthcare settings.
Investigators
Charles C Chima
Adjunct Assistant Professor
Baylor College of Medicine
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Has had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months
- •Aged 18 to 75 years
- •Most recent HbA1c taken within 30 days was ≥ 8.0
- •At least moderate diabetes distress (a mean score ≥ 2.0 on the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale).
Exclusion Criteria
- •Moderately-severe to severe depression: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) score ≥15
- •Other severe mental health disorder (e.g. Alzheimer's, schizophrenia)
- •Current pregnancy
- •Severe diabetes complications or functional deficits (e.g. kidney failure requiring dialysis, amputation, blindness).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Diabetes distress score
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months from baseline
Change in diabetes distress score as measured by the diabetes distress scale (DDS). DDS scores range from 1 to 6, with scores that are less than 2.0 being indicative of little or no distress. Hence scores of 2.0 and above are significant and higher values are indicative of worse outcome.
Secondary Outcomes
- HbA1c(3 months and 6 months from baseline)
- Self-care behaviors (medication adherence, dietary practices, and physical activity behaviors)(3 months and 6 months from baseline)