MedPath

A study to compare the efficacy of antiseptics Chlorhexidine alcohol vs Povidone Iodine alcohol in reducing bacterial colonisation by intravenous catheter in Paediatric ward in hospital

Phase 3
Registration Number
CTRI/2023/03/050292
Lead Sponsor
Datta Meghe Institute of Higher education and Research
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

1.All Paediatric patient (1month -16 years) requiring admission in Paediatric ward.

2.Indication for PVC for at least 48 hours.

3.Parents willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1.Skin injury at catheter insertion sites.

2.Catheter inserted in emergency.

3.Known allergy to the chlorhexidine Or Povidone iodine.

4.Difficult insertion of catheter as in obese patient or repeat attempts.

5.Patients critically ill not expecting to survive more than a week

6.Not willing for the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary outcome will be incidence of catheter tip colonisation on culture.Timepoint: 1.Day 1 of admission - Peripheral venous catheter to be inserted after cleaning by either 2â?? chlorhexidine alcohol or 10â?? povidone iodine alcohol <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>At end of 72 hrs -IV Catheter removed and catheter tip send for culture for colonisation
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary outcome will be incidence of Catheter occlusion, accidental catheter removal, catheter related blood stream infection, incidence of side effects related to type of antiseptic use.Timepoint: Within 72 hours
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath