A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Prosthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass Versus Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Symptomatic Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 86
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Primary artery/graft patency
研究概览
简要总结
This study is a comparison of two different ways to treat blockage in the artery of the thigh. The first is an older way with incisions in the groin and just above the knee. A plastic tube is then inserted to make a bypass from the groin to the knee. The second treatment offered is through a needle hole in the groin. A thin plastic tube covering a metal stent is inserted into the artery and released to bypass the blockage from inside the artery. No incisions are needed. Patients are enrolled and then selected for one treatment method or another by chance. The patients will be followed for two years to see how the two different treatment methods work compared to each other.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients that had atherosclerotic stenotic or occlusive lesions of the superficial femoral artery with no significant aorto-iliac disease. The infra-popliteal segment had to be patent with at least single vessel run-off to the ankle. Patients had to be acceptable surgical candidates in the event they were randomized to the surgical arm.
排除标准
- •Non-operative candidate,Contraindication to IV contrast use, Planned surgery with venous conduit, previously stented segment of the superficial femoral artery, poorly compliant patient.
结局指标
主要结局
Primary artery/graft patency
时间窗: 24 months
Limb Salvage
时间窗: 24 months
Improvement in symptoms of lower extremity Ischemia
时间窗: 24 Months
次要结局
- Secondary artery/graft patency(24 months)