MedPath

Computer Guided Versus Conventional Surgical Removal of Deeply Impacted Mandibular Third Molar With Preservation of External Oblique Ridge

Not Applicable
Conditions
Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Interventions
Procedure: Conventional surgery
Procedure: computer guided surgical
Device: CBCT
Registration Number
NCT03447067
Lead Sponsor
Alaadden Mahmoud Abu Al Enein
Brief Summary

in patent have deeply impacted lower third molar ,dose computer guided enhance surgical outcome versus conventional surgical remove of wisdom teeth

Detailed Description

P- Patient with deeply impacted mandibular molar I- Computer guided surgical cutting stent C- Conventional extraction O- Clinical outcome sound radiographic outcomes primary outcome

- pain : each patient well be asked to rate current and worst pain intensity on visual analogue scale (VAS ) of 0-10 with Zero being no pain and Ten corresponds to the worst pain.

Secondary outcome

* evaluation of maximum inter incisal opening: assessment of MMO will be performed by measuring the distance in mm between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisor by using tape graduated method.

* evaluation of edema throw use nylon thread.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
18
Inclusion Criteria
  • patient with deeply impacted mandibular third molar
  • patients should be free from any systematic disease that affect normal healing
Exclusion Criteria
  • -Patient with soft tissue impaction and impaction class A position 1
  • Medical problem that may interfere with the procedures such as bleeding disorder & pregnant.
  • Uncooperative patient.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
computer guided surgeryConventional surgerycomprised 9 patient undergoing surgical removal of deeply impacted mandibular third molar using computer guided surgical cutting stent. Based on (panorama , CBCT and fabricating computer guided stent technique: 1- flap design 2- accurate setting stent in a predesign site 3- bony window removing according to the stent design 4- surgical separation of the teeth with extraction the remaning part . 5- identify the nerve 6- replace the bony window in to original place with stability 7- closure and depridment
computer guided surgeryCBCTcomprised 9 patient undergoing surgical removal of deeply impacted mandibular third molar using computer guided surgical cutting stent. Based on (panorama , CBCT and fabricating computer guided stent technique: 1- flap design 2- accurate setting stent in a predesign site 3- bony window removing according to the stent design 4- surgical separation of the teeth with extraction the remaning part . 5- identify the nerve 6- replace the bony window in to original place with stability 7- closure and depridment
Conventional surgerycomputer guided surgicalcomprised 9 patient undergoing surgical removal of deeply impacted mandibular third molar by regular manor. (Based on :Panorama and CBCT ) technique : 1- flap design 2- bone removal 3- tooth division 4- closure flap (suture)
Conventional surgeryCBCTcomprised 9 patient undergoing surgical removal of deeply impacted mandibular third molar by regular manor. (Based on :Panorama and CBCT ) technique : 1- flap design 2- bone removal 3- tooth division 4- closure flap (suture)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Painimmediate post operative ,at three day pain change till fourteen day day .

each patient well be asked to rate current and worst pain intensity on visual analogue scale (VAS ) of 0-10 with Zero being no pain and Ten corresponds to the worst pain(pain change during follow up period .

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
evaluation of maximum inter incisal openingimmediate post operative ,at three day inter incisal change till fourteen day .

assessment of MMO will be performed by measuring the distance in mm between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisor by using tape graduated method.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath