MedPath

Injection of Tenoxicam Versus Arthrocentesis Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Arthrocentesis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT05497570
Lead Sponsor
Ataturk University
Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection and to compare it with arthrocentesis alone in patients with TMJ-OA.

Thirty patients with TMJ-OA who were treated randomly with either arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection (TX group) or arthrocentesis alone (control group) were examined. Maximum mouth opening (MMO), visual analog scale (VAS) pain values, and joint sounds were the outcome variables, which were evaluated at pre-treatment and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.

Detailed Description

Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) is a very painful disease that disrupts the patient's comfort of life. Arthrocentesis alone or in combination with intraarticular injections is highly effective in the treatment of TMJ-OA. It reduces pain, increases mouth opening, and improves jaw movements. In intra-articular injections, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are used. Tenoxicam is an NSAID that is used systemically or locally in joint diseases such as acute or chronic inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. It has been reported that its long-lasting analgesic effect and anti-inflammatory effect are higher in intra-articular administration than in oral and intravenous administrations , to our knowledge, there has been no such study analysing the effectiveness of intra-articular application of tenoxicam in patients with TMJ-OA. The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection and to compare it with arthrocentesis alone in patients with TMJ-OA.

Thirty patients with TMJ-OA who were treated randomly with either arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection (TX group) or arthrocentesis alone (control group) were examined. Maximum mouth opening (MMO), visual analog scale (VAS) pain values, and joint sounds were the outcome variables, which were evaluated at pre-treatment and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Clinical and radiological diagnosis of TMJ-OA
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Sufficient clinical data at baseline and follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Neurological disease
  • Previous TMJ surgery
  • Malignant disease in the head and neck region

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
TenoxicamTenoxicam Injectable ProductThe Tenoxicam group (n:16) received both arthrocentesis and a 2-ml injection of tenoxicam (Oksamen-L, Mustafa Nevzat İlaç Sanayi, Istanbul, Turkey) to the temporomandibular joint.
ControlTenoxicam Injectable ProductOnly arthrocentesis was given to patients in the control group
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain on Tmj (Visual analog scale(VAS) was used.)Change from baseline pain on TMJ at six months

Pain scores of Temporomandibular joint on a visual analog scale.To measure the VAS value, a 10-cm-long numbered line was created. The patient chose a point on the line, the corresponding value was measured with a ruler, and a score was given. 0 means no pain and best outcome score; 10 means maximum pain and the worst score.

Maximum Mouth Opening(MMO) (A ruler was used)Change from baseline maximum mouth opening at six months

MMO was gaged with a ruler between the incisal edges of the maxillar and mandibular central incisors when the patient open the mouth maximum. The score was written in mm.

Joint sounds (Visual analog scale was used to measure.)Change from baseline joint sounds at six months

Temporomandibular joint sounds was measured with Visual analog scale (VAS).To measure the VAS value, a 10-cm-long numbered line was created. The patient chose a point on the line, the corresponding value was measured with a ruler, and a score was given. 0 means no sounds and best outcome score; 10 means maximum sound and the worst score.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ataturk University

🇹🇷

Erzurum, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath