MedPath

Endovenous Radiofrequency Versus Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Varicose Veins
Interventions
Other: radiofrequency
Registration Number
NCT02080013
Lead Sponsor
Ain Shams University
Brief Summary

our aim is to compare early outcomes following EVL 1320 nm and segmental RF in a randomized study.

Detailed Description

Endovenous Radiofrequency versus Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
5
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years with incompetent GSVs documented on duplex ultrasound (US; B-mode and color Doppler imaging) were eligible
Exclusion Criteria
  • Exclusion criteria consisted of:
  • Current deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
  • Thrombus in the vein of interest
  • Previous GSV treatment
  • Pregnancy
  • Known malignancy
  • Significant arterial disease (ankle : brachial pressure index below 0•8)
  • Use of anticoagulant medication.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ClosureFast groupradiofrequencyRadiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux
group 1radiofrequencyEVL group Endovenous Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability30 days
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath