Endovenous Radiofrequency Versus Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Varicose Veins
- Interventions
- Other: radiofrequency
- Registration Number
- NCT02080013
- Lead Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Brief Summary
our aim is to compare early outcomes following EVL 1320 nm and segmental RF in a randomized study.
- Detailed Description
Endovenous Radiofrequency versus Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 5
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years with incompetent GSVs documented on duplex ultrasound (US; B-mode and color Doppler imaging) were eligible
Exclusion Criteria
- Exclusion criteria consisted of:
- Current deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
- Thrombus in the vein of interest
- Previous GSV treatment
- Pregnancy
- Known malignancy
- Significant arterial disease (ankle : brachial pressure index below 0•8)
- Use of anticoagulant medication.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description ClosureFast group radiofrequency Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux group 1 radiofrequency EVL group Endovenous Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability 30 days
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method