Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07307534
NCT07307534Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Central Nevus Removal Versus Conservative Treatment for Halo Nevus With Vitiligo: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Xijing Hospital1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: December 31, 2025Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Percentage of Participants Achieving VASl50 Response

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of central nevus removal versus conservative treatment in patients with halo nevus accompanied by non-segmental vitiligo. It is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 60 participants aged ≤50 years, who will be randomly assigned to either the nevus removal group or the conservative treatment group. The removal group will undergo surgical or laser excision of the central nevus followed by medication, while the conservative group will receive medication only. Both groups will be followed for 6 months. Outcomes include repigmentation assessment using vitiligo scoring indices, quality of life measures, and serial serum cytokine profiling. The study seeks to provide high-level evidence to guide clinical management of halo nevus with vitiligo. Key points:

  1. For patients with halo nevus accompanied by non-segmental vitiligo.
  2. Compares nevus excision and conservative treatment.
  3. Follows participants for 6 months.
  4. Focuses on effectiveness and safety.

Detailed Description

Background:

Halo nevus and vitiligo are both autoimmune pigment loss disorders that frequently co-occur and share overlapping immune pathways. Current management of halo nevus with vitiligo remains controversial: removal of the central nevus may eliminate an immune target and promote repigmentation but carries risks of Koebner phenomenon and scarring; conservative treatment avoids procedural trauma but may yield slower or suboptimal responses. Robust prospective comparisons of these strategies are lacking.

  1. Study Design:

Single-center, randomized controlled trial. Sixty patients with halo nevus and non-segmental vitiligo (BSA ≤2%) will be randomized 1:1 to the excision group or the conservative group. 2. Excision group: Central nevus removal via CO₂ laser (if diameter <0.3 cm) or surgical excision (if ≥0.3 cm), followed by standardized medication after 1 week. 3. Conservative group: Standardized medication only, without nevus removal. The standardized medication regimen is as follows:

For stable disease, apply topical 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily combined with NB-UVB phototherapy once every other day.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
6 Years to 50 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with halo nevus accompanied by non-segmental vitiligo, with BSA ≤2% (excluding acral regions).
  • Central nevus confirmed as benign melanocytic nevus through clinical observation and dermatoscope.
  • Age ≤50 years, regardless of gender ④ Physically able to tolerate surgery and local anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring (to avoid abnormal hyperplasia at the operative site and interference with repigmentation assessment)
  • Other autoimmune diseases (e.g., hyperthyroidism)
  • Patients with significant endocrine disorders, psychiatric conditions, hematologic diseases, hepatic/renal disorders, cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases, severe infections, or other major systemic illnesses
  • Use of hormonal medications, immunomodulators, or phototherapy within the past 1 month ⑤ Pregnant or lactating women ⑥ Allergy to anesthetic agents or excipients
  • Poor psychological status or compliance, unable to cooperate with postoperative follow-up or care ⑧ Concurrent conditions requiring other treatments that may interfere with the study observations

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants Achieving VASl50 Response

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.

VASl (Vitiligo Area and Severity lndex) 50 response is defined as a 50% or greater reduction in VASl score from baseline. Assessment is conducted by trained dermatologists using standardized VASl scoring criteria.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Vitiligo Area and Severity Index (VASl) Score(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.)
  • Percentage of Participants Achieving VASI75 and VASI90 responses at each follow-up time point(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.)
  • Change in Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) Score(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.)
  • Change in Vitiligo Extent Score (VES) Score(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.)
  • Change in Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) Score(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.)
  • Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.)
  • Proportion of Participants Achieving investigator Global Assessment (lGA) Score lmprovement(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.)
  • Change in Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) Score(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.)
  • Change in The Vitiligo-specific Quality-of-Life instrument (VitiQoL) Score(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.)

Investigators

Sponsor
Xijing Hospital
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials