MedPath

Effects of a Contextual Decision-making Materials on Junior Nurses in Traumatic Learning Performance

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Pelvic Injury
Abdominal Injury
Interventions
Device: Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making
Device: Interactive Educational Material
Registration Number
NCT06574607
Lead Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Brief Summary

Trauma leading to severe bleeding is one of the reasons for the high mortality rate in trauma patients, resulting in multiple and complex injuries from various accidental mechanisms. However, patients with abdominal-pelvic trauma accidents rank among the top three common accidents in the emergency department. There is a potential for both trauma and severe internal bleeding, making the care of such patients even more challenging. Currently, trauma nursing education focuses on emergency medical care, and teaching on the care of abdominal-pelvic trauma occupies only a small part of the entire nursing curriculum.

In addition to insufficient knowledge teaching in emergency trauma medical care, learning relies heavily on the arrangement of clinical internships, and obtaining practical experience in the care of abdominal-pelvic trauma is often difficult. In the current era of thriving digital learning, allowing learning to be more diverse and unrestricted by time and location, it is essential to integrate appropriate guiding strategies alongside digital technology to make learning more efficient and promote meaningful learning.

Therefore, this study introduces decision trees into an interactive scenario-based learning environment for the care of severe bleeding due to abdominal-pelvic trauma. The decision tree is coupled with a decision-making strategy, utilizing the relationships between leaf nodes to guide learners in clarifying their misconceptions, ultimately leading them to make appropriate decisions to reach the final nodes and solve problems.

To understand the effectiveness of this study, a real experimental research design is adopted to investigate the impact of introducing decision tree-based interactive teaching materials on the care of severe bleeding in abdominal-pelvic trauma situations on the professional knowledge, self-efficacy, clinical reasoning assessment ability, and technology acceptance of surgical nursing students over a two-year period. It is hoped that this interactive teaching material for the care of severe bleeding in abdominal-pelvic trauma scenarios will enhance learners' professional knowledge, self-efficacy, clinical reasoning assessment, and technology acceptanc.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • Holding a nursing license, employed, and having job registration in the same institution.
  • Those who are willing to participate in this study, are informed, and have provided consent by signing the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
  • Those who have completed a service period of more than two years
  • Those who refuse to participate in this study.
  • Non-Surgical Department ward nurses

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
experimental groupInteractive Educational Material for Decision-Making-
control groupInteractive Educational Material-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Technology Acceptance learning outcomeup to 1 month

The changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Technology Acceptance, Questionnaire including:

Technology Acceptance Scale:Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing better Technology Acceptance.

The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care self-efficacy learning outcomeup to 1 month

The changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care self-efficacy will be measured, Questionnaire including:

Self-Efficacy Scale:Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing better self-efficacy.

The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care knowledge learning outcomeup to 1 month

TThe changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care knowledge, Questionnaire including:

Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding knowledge Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores representing higher knowledge of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care

The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation learning outcomeup to 1 month

The changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation , Questionnaire including:

Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation Tool(CREST): Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing more positive Clinical Reasoning Evaluation beliefs.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Taiwan

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath