Helmet CPAP Versus HFNC in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
- Interventions
- Device: hCPAP versus HFNC
- Registration Number
- NCT04005092
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
- Brief Summary
This study objectively held to compare the physiological outcomes in the non-invasive (NIV) treatment of Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema (ACPE) patients in the Emergency Department (ED) delivered by Helmet CPAP (hCPAP) and HFNC.Patients will be randomized to receive either hCPAP or HFNC.
- Detailed Description
Non-invasive ventilation(NIV) has different types of interfaces that had been used in acute hypoxaemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure. The appropriate interface is necessary to provide comfort and lead to the success of NIV.
Helmet continuous positive airway pressure (hCPAP) is an NIV interface that allows the provision of high airway pressures with a minimal leak.
HFNC which delivers heated humidified high flow oxygen provides a good alternative to the conventional NIV in terms of comfort
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 188
All patients aged more than 18 years old presented with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.
- Age less than 18 years old
- Low GCS (less than 8), altered mental status
- Hemodynamic instability, impending cardiopulmonary arrest
- Use of vasopressors, inotropes
- Exacerbation of asthma or chronic respiratory failure
- Urgent need for endotracheal intubation
- Absence of airway protective gag reflex
- Elevated intracranial pressure
- Tracheostomy
- Pregnant
- Upper airway obstruction
- Injuries or surgery to head and neck less than 6 months upon presentation
- Claustrophobia
- Blind or poor vision
- Medico-legal related cases
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure(hCPAP) hCPAP versus HFNC Helmet CPAP produce a better physiological outcomes after 1-hour intervention High Flow Nasal Cannula(HFNC) hCPAP versus HFNC HFNC produce a better physiological outcomes after 1-hour intervention
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Respiratory Rate 1 hour Respiratory rate reduction post intervention
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Heart Rate 1 hour Heart rate reduction post intervention
Heart Rate,Acidosis (pH), Consciousness (GCS), Oxygenation (PF ratio) And Respiratory Rate(HACOR) Score 1 hour Heart rate,Acidosis (pH), Consciousness (GCS), Oxygenation (PF ratio) and Respiratory rate(HACOR) Score improvement post intervention.HACOR is an acronym for heart rate, acidosis (pH), consciousness (GCS), oxygenation (PF ratio) and respiratory rate in which each parameter is an independent predictor for NIV failure. HACOR score is out of 25 with differential weighting of each parameter.
Ratio Of Partial Pressure Arterial Oxygen And Fraction Of Oxygen 1 hour Partial arterial oxygen/fraction of oxygen ratio improvement post intervention
Dyspnoea Scale 1 hour Dyspnoea scale improvement post intervention.Dyspnea scale measured using an unmarked 10cm VAS card that had mark with "I can breathe normally", at one end correspond to patients' normal baseline breathing which score "0" and on the other end "I can't breathe at all", which score "10" represent the worst difficulty perceived by patients.
Partial Pressure Of Arterial Oxygen Level 1 hour Partial arterial oxygen level post intervention
Rate Of Intubation 1 hour Intubation rate post intervention
28-Days Mortality In Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema 28 days Mortality due to Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Emergency Department, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
🇲🇾Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia