MedPath

Helmet CPAP Versus HFNC in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Interventions
Device: hCPAP versus HFNC
Registration Number
NCT04005092
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
Brief Summary

This study objectively held to compare the physiological outcomes in the non-invasive (NIV) treatment of Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema (ACPE) patients in the Emergency Department (ED) delivered by Helmet CPAP (hCPAP) and HFNC.Patients will be randomized to receive either hCPAP or HFNC.

Detailed Description

Non-invasive ventilation(NIV) has different types of interfaces that had been used in acute hypoxaemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure. The appropriate interface is necessary to provide comfort and lead to the success of NIV.

Helmet continuous positive airway pressure (hCPAP) is an NIV interface that allows the provision of high airway pressures with a minimal leak.

HFNC which delivers heated humidified high flow oxygen provides a good alternative to the conventional NIV in terms of comfort

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
188
Inclusion Criteria

All patients aged more than 18 years old presented with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.

Exclusion Criteria
  1. Age less than 18 years old
  2. Low GCS (less than 8), altered mental status
  3. Hemodynamic instability, impending cardiopulmonary arrest
  4. Use of vasopressors, inotropes
  5. Exacerbation of asthma or chronic respiratory failure
  6. Urgent need for endotracheal intubation
  7. Absence of airway protective gag reflex
  8. Elevated intracranial pressure
  9. Tracheostomy
  10. Pregnant
  11. Upper airway obstruction
  12. Injuries or surgery to head and neck less than 6 months upon presentation
  13. Claustrophobia
  14. Blind or poor vision
  15. Medico-legal related cases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure(hCPAP)hCPAP versus HFNCHelmet CPAP produce a better physiological outcomes after 1-hour intervention
High Flow Nasal Cannula(HFNC)hCPAP versus HFNCHFNC produce a better physiological outcomes after 1-hour intervention
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Respiratory Rate1 hour

Respiratory rate reduction post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Heart Rate1 hour

Heart rate reduction post intervention

Heart Rate,Acidosis (pH), Consciousness (GCS), Oxygenation (PF ratio) And Respiratory Rate(HACOR) Score1 hour

Heart rate,Acidosis (pH), Consciousness (GCS), Oxygenation (PF ratio) and Respiratory rate(HACOR) Score improvement post intervention.HACOR is an acronym for heart rate, acidosis (pH), consciousness (GCS), oxygenation (PF ratio) and respiratory rate in which each parameter is an independent predictor for NIV failure. HACOR score is out of 25 with differential weighting of each parameter.

Ratio Of Partial Pressure Arterial Oxygen And Fraction Of Oxygen1 hour

Partial arterial oxygen/fraction of oxygen ratio improvement post intervention

Dyspnoea Scale1 hour

Dyspnoea scale improvement post intervention.Dyspnea scale measured using an unmarked 10cm VAS card that had mark with "I can breathe normally", at one end correspond to patients' normal baseline breathing which score "0" and on the other end "I can't breathe at all", which score "10" represent the worst difficulty perceived by patients.

Partial Pressure Of Arterial Oxygen Level1 hour

Partial arterial oxygen level post intervention

Rate Of Intubation1 hour

Intubation rate post intervention

28-Days Mortality In Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema28 days

Mortality due to Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Emergency Department, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun

🇲🇾

Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath