NMDA Enhancers in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Sarcosine vs. D-Serine
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Total scores of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Quality of Life (QOL)
研究概览
简要总结
Both GlyT-1 inhibitors and NMDA-glycine site agonists have been demonstrated to be beneficial for chronic schizophrenia patients.
The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of add-on treatment of sarcosine, a GlyT-1 inhibitor, and D-serine, an NMDA-glycine site agonist, in chronically stable schizophrenia patients who have been stabilized with antipsychotics.
详细描述
The etiology of schizophrenia remains unclear. Schizophrenia patients reveal positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive impairments. In addition to dopamine system hyperactivity, hypofunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor plays a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Consequently, enhancing NMDA receptor neurotransmission has been regarded as a novel treatment approach. To date, there have been several reported trials on NMDA enhancers. Both sarcosine (N-methylglycine, a glycine transporter I inhibitor) and D-serine (a potent NMDA-glycine site agonist) showed therapeutic effects in chronically stable patients. Interestingly, sarcosine appeared more efficacious than D-serine in acutely exacerbated ones when added-on to antipsychotics. Both sarcosine and D-serine yielded excellent safety profiles.
It remains unclear whether sarcosine can be also more efficacious than D-serine in the treatment for chronically stable schizophrenia. The aim of this project is to examine the efficacy and safety of add-on treatment of sarcosine vs. D-serine in chronically stable schizophrenia patients who have been stabilized with antipsychotics.
In the study, 60-75 schizophrenic patients are recruited into the 6-week trial and randomly assigned into the three groups (2 gm/d sarcosine, 2 gm/d D-serine, or placebo) with a double-blind manner. Clinical manifestation (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS], side effects and quality of life (QOL) are evaluated every two weeks during the trial.. The efficacies of three groups are compared.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Fulfill the criteria of schizophrenia according to the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual, fourth edition (DSM-IV).
- •Agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent.
排除标准
- •Meet DSM-IV criteria of major mood disorder, current substance dependence or mental retardation
- •History of epilepsy, head trauma or CNS diseases
- •Major, untreated medical diseases
- •Pregnancy or lactation
结局指标
主要结局
Total scores of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Quality of Life (QOL)
时间窗: 6 weeks
次要结局
- Subscales of PANSS(6 weeks)