Effects of Pain Neuroscience Education on Pain, Body Function, Activity disorders and Depression in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 40
研究概览
简要总结
In order to evaluate pain, it was analyzed as an average value through the pressure pain threshold value measured based on the trigger points of the lumbar spine No. 3 of both waist. In the right lumbar pain threshold measurement, the experimental group showed significant improvement from 4.89±0.97kgf/cm2 before intervention to 6.78±0.83kgf/cm2 after intervention (p<0.01), and the control group showed significant improvement from 4.84±0.88kgf/cm2 after intervention to 6.24±1.23kgf/cm2 after intervention (p<0.01). In the comparison of differences between groups according to the intervention method, there was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (p<0.001). In the measurement of the tenderness threshold of the left waist, the experimental group showed a significant improvement from 4.91±1.10kgf/cm2 before intervention to 6.98±1.00kgf/cm2 after intervention, and the control group showed a significant improvement from 5.03±0.85kgf/cm2 before intervention to 6.41 ± 1.14 kgf/cm2. In the comparison of differences between groups according to the intervention method, there was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (p<0.001). In order to evaluate physical function, the average value was analyzed through the range of motion of the joints of both hip joints and the joints measured by the Schuber test. In the range of joint operation of the lateral hip joint, the experimental group showed a significant improvement from 111.16±2.05° before intervention to 116.45±1.50° after intervention (p<0.01), and the control group showed a significant improvement from 111.90±2.32° after intervention (p<0.01). In the comparison of differences between groups according to the intervention method, there was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (p<0.001). In the range of joint motion of the left hip joint, the experimental group showed a significant improvement from 112.25±3.01° before intervention to 116.97±1.58° after intervention (p<0.01), and the control group showed a significant improvement from 111.65±3.40° after intervention (p<0.01). In the comparison of differences between groups according to the intervention method, there was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (p<0.001). In the range of joint operation of the right hip joint, the experimental group showed a significant improvement from 12.56±0.68° before intervention to 13.76±0.50° after intervention (p<0.01), and the control group showed a significant improvement from 12.43±0.55° before intervention to 13.37±0.54° after intervention (p<0.01). In the comparison of differences between groups according to the intervention method, there was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (p<0.001). In the range of articulation of the left hip joint, the experimental group showed a significant improvement from 12.87±0.65° before intervention to 14.10±0.53° after intervention (p<0.01), and the control group showed a significant improvement from 12.97±0.64° before intervention to 13.73±0.51° after intervention (p<0.01). In the comparison of differences between groups according to the intervention method, there was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (p<0.001). The results before and after the Schober test showed a significant improvement from 4.31±0.81cm before intervention to 5.41±0.80cm after intervention (p<0.01), and the control group showed a significant improvement from 4.04±0.78cm before intervention to 5.13±0.82cm after intervention (p<0.01). In the comparison of differences between groups according to the intervention method, there was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (p<0.001). In order to evaluate the activity disorder, it was analyzed as an average value through the result values measured by K-RMDQ and K-ODI.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional Study
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 60(Year) 至 69(Year)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •The criteria for selecting subjects were those in their 50s to 60s who complained of back pain more than 3 months ago, those without surgical experience, those without visual and hearing impairments, those who can understand and perform the researcher's instructions with 24 points (MMSE-K), and those with a study participation rate of 80% or more.
排除标准
- •The exclusion criteria for the study subjects were those with back surgery experience, those with Oswestry Disability Index mean or higher, those with less than 24 MMSE-K points, and those with less than 80% of the study participation rate.