NCT07612462Active, not recruitingNot Applicable
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of a Bulk Fill Resin Composite in Cuspal Coverage Restorations of Vital Posterior Teeth (RCT)
Future University in Egypt1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2025Last updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Sponsor
- Future University in Egypt
- Enrollment
- 50
- Locations
- 1
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This clinical study aims to compare bulk-fill and conventional composite resins in cuspal coverage restorations of posterior teeth. The primary outcomes include evaluating wear resistance, fracture incidence, and recurrent caries at different follow-up periods. Bulk-fill composites are designed for easier placement in thicker increments, potentially improving clinical efficiency. The study seeks to determine whether bulk-fill materials can provide comparable or superior performance to conventional composites in restoring structurally compromised teeth.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Na
- Intervention Model
- Single Group
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adult patients of 20 to 50 of age
- •Molars teeth
- •Medically free
- •Vital teeth
- •Males or females
- •one or cusps affected
- •Patient consent
- •Good oral hygiene (plaque index 0 or 1)
- •Absence of parafunctional habits.
- •No abscess
Exclusion Criteria
- •Xerostomia and bruxism.
- •Endodontically treated teeth
- •Systematic disease
- •Extremely poor oral hygiene sever or chronic periodontitis.
- •Pregnant and lactating women.
- •No subgingival margin
- •Allergic to used materials
- •Patient are not present during recalls .
Investigators
Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Azazy
Principal Investigator
Future University in Egypt
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Flowable Composite Versus Submicron Hybrid Composite in Class I Carious Cavities.NCT07575282Cairo University25
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparing tooth sensitivity after two types of class II cavity treatmentsCTRI/2025/06/089739URVASHI AGRAWAL74
Completed
Not Applicable
Does a Highly Filled Injectable Resin Composite Work Better Alone or in Combination With a Nanohybride Resin Composite?NCT07267143Tolunay Aytas45
Completed
Not Applicable
Clinical Performance of an Innovative Self-cure Bulk-Fill Composite Compared to Dual-Cure and Light-Cure Bulk-Fill Composite in Posterior Restorations.NCT07410468Marwan Abdelnaser20
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparative evaluation of three full coverage restorations in pediatric dentistry.CTRI/2024/11/077418Irin Mariam Zachariah45
