Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03381937
NCT03381937
Unknown
Not Applicable

Impact of the Pre-phonatory Inspiratory Volume on the Speech Quality of Neuromuscular Patients Dependent on Non-invasive Ventilation

Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 8051 site in 1 country15 target enrollmentFebruary 6, 2018

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Neuromuscular Diseases
Sponsor
Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805
Enrollment
15
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Phonation duration
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

We want to demonstrate that modifications of the ventilation parameters are liable to improve the different characteristics of phonation (duration, intensity, prosody..) in neuromuscular patients who are dependent on non invasive ventilation.

Detailed Description

Speech and communication quality depend on respiration efficiency. The respiratory involvement observed in neuromuscular disorders can impair speech quality in patients, while the underlying disease may also contribute to alter phonation. Nowadays, the first line treatment of neuromuscular chronic neuromuscular respiratory failure is noninvasive ventilation (NIV). With disease progression, it is used with increasingly duration during daytime. In that situation, mouthpiece ventilation is preferred as it allows efficient ventilation while being more comfortable for patients who can chose when they want to be ventilated. However, in that situation, patients do not receive ventilatory support while they are speaking which puts them in a less favorable situation for speech. We think that pre-phonation inspiratory volume is an essential part of speech quality. Without mechanical ventilation, this volume is reduced as a consequence of respiratory failure but it is liable to increase significantly if the patient used the volume delivered by the ventilator . We believe that phonation is improved by NIV by applying specific ventilation parameters in patients dependant on mechanical ventilation. The modification could be used by neuromuscular patients to improve speech quality; the patients would then be able to use their usual ventilatory support to improve phonation and modulation of their speech. In this crossover open labelled, randomised study, done in a single center (home ventilation unit of the referral center of Hospital Raymond Poincaré HUPIFO (University Hospital of Western Paris and Ile de France) (Garches, France)), phonation characteristics will be studied in 3 situations (during spontaneous breathing without ventilatory support, with the usual NIV parameters, with speech-specific NIV parameters) during which speech trials will be performed.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 6, 2018
End Date
January 2020
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • adult patients (age \> or equal to 18)
  • chronic restrictive respiratory failure due to neuromuscular disease
  • spontaneous breathing autonomy of at least one hour during the days
  • stable clinical state
  • patient with middle school education level (able to read)
  • patients using life support ventilator ((Astral 150 (ResMed®), Elysée (ResMed®), Trilogy (Philips Respironics®), VentilogicLS (Weinman®), Vivo 40 (Breas®), PB560 ou Légendair (Covidien®), Monal T50 (Air liquide system®))

Exclusion Criteria

  • refusal to participate
  • unability to cooperate
  • illiterate patients
  • tracheostomised patients
  • spontaneous breathing autonomy \< 1h
  • cardiovascular instability
  • not registered with the social security system

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Phonation duration

Time Frame: 1 hour

evaluation by the measurement of the longest duration of a sustained A sound. The subject is asked to sustain a vowel as long as possible during a respiratory cycle while being recorded. Phonation duration is measured (in seconds) on the recording

Secondary Outcomes

  • Speech Intelligibility(1 hour)
  • Reading duration(1 hour)
  • Quality of prosodia(1 hour)
  • Phonation quality(1 hour)
  • Phonation flow(1 hour)
  • Breathing quality(1 hour)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials