MedPath

Study Comparing Blue Light Imaging (BLI) With Flexible Spectral-Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Endoscopy
Interventions
Device: Single Endoscopy Procedure
Registration Number
NCT02755285
Lead Sponsor
Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.
Brief Summary

The study is intended to demonstrate substantial equivalence of visualization using BLI to the predicate device, FICE, so as to support the addition of BLI as an adjunct to white light imaging in the company's video processor.

Detailed Description

This clinical study will consist of acquisition of images, followed by a reader study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Referred for clinically indicated gastrointestinal diagnostic endoscopy
  • Ability to understand the requirements of the study, to provide written informed consent and to comply with the study protocol
  • Ability to understand and provide written authorization for the use and disclosure of protected health information (PHI) per the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy ruling.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Under the age of 21 years
  • Is an inmate (see US Code of Federal Regulations 45 C.F.R. 46.306)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Single Endoscopy ProcedureSingle Endoscopy ProcedureAll subjects will have 1 endoscopy procedure, in which they will have a white light examination followed by FICE and BLI imaging on a maximum of two (2) anatomical sites per subject.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Image Quality Scores Using Likert ScaleTwo to three months

Likert score ratings of image quality for Blue Light Imaging (BLI), Blue Light Imaging-bright (BLI-brt) and Flexible spectral-Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE) images. Each BLI and BLI-Brt setting was compared to FICE, to determine which settings were equivalent to FICE.

Likert Score Scale:

1. Not seen;

2. poor but usable, characteristic features are detectable but details are not fully reproduced; features just visible;

3. good; allows an adequate assessment, details of anatomical structures are visible but not necessarily clearly defined; details emerging;

4. very good; allows an excellent assessment, anatomical details are clearly defined; details clear

This was a blinded and randomized Reader assessment of all BLI and FICE images.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mayo Clinic AZ

🇺🇸

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath