Difference between effectiveness of two desensitizing agents
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/05/019252
- Lead Sponsor
- A R Pradeep kumar
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
patients with good general health, within 18-60years of age, with dentin hypersensitivity in at least one tooth in any two quadrants and exhibiting pain scores of two or more on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were included in the study
Patients who were receiving or had received periodontal treatment within the past three months; used desensitizing treatment within past 6 months; using anti inflammatory, analgesic, psychotropic, or anti-depressant drugs: were pregnant or lactating; were allergic to any of the components in the desensitizing agents used in the study; and patients with eating disorders were excluded. Additionally, teeth with carious lesions, cracked/fractured teeth or teeth that required restorative treatment were excluded
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To investigate the clinical efficacy of two different desensitizing agents i.e., Profluorid Varnish (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) and Uno Topical Gel (Germiphene, Brantford, Canada) in reducing dentin hypersensitivity immediately after application and after 1 week.Timepoint: Immediately after application and after 1 week.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To investigate the clinical efficacy of two different desensitizing agents i.e., Profluorid Varnish (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) and Uno Topical Gel (Germiphene, Brantford, Canada) in reducing dentin hypersensitivity among which either one of the material is better.Timepoint: Immediately after application and after 1 week.