Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2024/06/068705
CTRI/2024/06/068705CompletedPhase 2

Evaluation of amount of true intrusion and apical root resorption of maxillary incisors using mini-screws, utility intrusion arch, and connecticut intrusion arch – A comparative study

Dr Aashutosh Chhabra1 site in 1 country45 target enrollmentStarted: June 24, 2024Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
45
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To compare and evaluate the amount of true intrusion and external apical root resorption achieved between mini-screws, utility arch and connecticut intrusion arch in the maxillary central incisors.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

AIM OF THE STUDY**:**

To compare and evaluate the amount of true intrusion and external apical root resorption achieved between mini-screws, utility arch and connecticut intrusion arch in the maxillary central incisors.

 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY:

§  To evaluate the amount of intrusion in maxillary central incisors achieved with mini-screws, utility intrusion arch and connecticut intrusion arch.

§  To evaluate the amount of external apical root resorption in maxillary central incisors caused by mini-screws, utility intrusion arch and connecticut intrusion arch during intrusion.

§  To compare the amount of intrusion in maxillary central incisors achieved with mini-screws, utility intrusion arch and connecticut intrusion arch.

§  To compare the amount of external apical root resorption in maxillary central incisors caused by mini-screws, utility intrusion arch and connecticut intrusion arch during intrusion.

NULL HYPOTHESIS**:**

The amount of intrusion is same with mini-screws, utility intrusion arch and connecticut intrusion arch placed on the maxillary central incisors.

The amount of external apical root resorption is same with mini-screws, utility intrusion arch and connecticut intrusion arch placed on the maxillary central incisors.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20.00 Year(s) to 35.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • Deep-bite more than 4mm, Pseudo deep-bite cases, Excessive gingival display in maxillary region, Normal upper anterior facial height, Normal angulation of upper incisors to nasal floor, Patient with no root resorption, Patient with good periodontal health.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Short upper lip after growth completion Vertical maxillary excess Proclined maxillary incisors Deep-bite less than 4mm True deep-bite History of trauma Prior root resorption Cyst/tumors in maxillary anterior region Periapical inflammation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare and evaluate the amount of true intrusion and external apical root resorption achieved between mini-screws, utility arch and connecticut intrusion arch in the maxillary central incisors.

Time Frame: T0- baseline | T1- 2 months | T2- 4 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • To compare and evaluate the amount of true intrusion and external apical root resorption achieved between mini-screws, utility arch and connecticut intrusion arch in the maxillary central incisors in first 2 months with later 2 months(FROM T0 to T1)

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr Aashutosh Chhabra
Sponsor Class
Other [Dr. Aashutosh Chhabra]
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Aashutosh Chhabra

Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials