跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03536247
NCT03536247招募中不适用

Prospective Randomized Trial of Cholangioscopy Guided Intraductal Lithotripsy Versus Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Endoscopic Treatment of Large Bile Duct Stones

University of Southern California4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2018年9月7日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
90
试验地点
4
主要终点
First procedure stone clearance

研究概览

简要总结

Our aim is to compare the efficacy, safety, procedural time required, and costs of a strategy initially employing cholangioscopy guided intraductal lithotripsy (laser/electrohydraulic lithtripsy (EHL)) versus a strategy initially using papillary dilation for removal of large bile duct stones.

详细描述

The study will be a prospective single blind randomized comparative trial. All patients presenting with choledocholithiasis will be considered for the study. If their ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates a large stone (>1cm) and they do not fulfill the exclusion criterion they will be eligible for the study. If a prior Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) demonstrates a stone >1cm, which could not be removed with standard methods, they will also be eligible. Randomization will be stratified based on whether or not the procedure is a first or repeat ERCP

Patients will be randomized using a computer generated randomization schedule with concealed allocation in a 1:1 assignment (allocation ratio) to initial cholangioscopy guided lithoripsy versus initial papillary dilation. Randomization will be blocked in groups of 12.

In those randomized to cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy, the procedure will be performed in the standard manner using a single operator cholangioscopy system and a holmium laser or EHL (dependent on availability). Those in the papillary dilation arm will undergo the standard approach using the combined papillary dilation balloon sphincterotomy system. The patients will be blinded as to treatment arm.

"Conventional" methods including mechanical lithotripsy or stent placement may be used to remove stones/debris in combination with the specified intervention, as is done for standard clinical care. Use of these strategies will be recorded

If stone removal fails with the assigned strategy, this will be considered failure of the assigned intervention. This decision will be made by the attending endoscopist and recorded. The patient will then crossover into the other treatment arm.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Participants in the study will be blinded to treatment arm. Care providers and Investigators will be unblinded to treated arm.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 115 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients 18 years and older
  • Undergoing ERCP at LAC+Medical Center or Keck Hospital of USC for the standard indication of bile duct stones with evidence of a large stone (>1cm) demonstrated either on Ultrasound, computed tomography, prior ERCP, or magnetic resonance imaging.

排除标准

  • Patients Under the age of 18
  • Patients with biliary malignancy
  • Prior biliary diversion surgery
  • Prior gastric bypass surgery
  • Patients who are incarcerated
  • Patients who are unable to give consent
  • Patients who pregnant

结局指标

主要结局

First procedure stone clearance

时间窗: 2 hours

Entire stone\[s\] removed in first procedure

次要结局

  • Adverse Events(1 week)
  • Procedure Time(2 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ara Sahakian

Assistant Professor of Medicine

University of Southern California

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验