跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03374176
NCT03374176已完成3 期

Efficacy of Amoxicillin-metronidazole Compared to Clindamycin in the Treatment of Periodontitis in Patients With Diabetes

Centro Universitario de Tonalá0 个研究点目标入组 42 人开始时间: 2014年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
42
主要终点
Probing Depth

研究概览

简要总结

Periodontitis is an inflammation of the supporting structures of the teeth, usually caused by specific or groups of microorganisms that results in the progressive destruction of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. the objective of periodontitis treatment is to reduce the number of periodontal pathogens. However, there is not an agreement in the use of systemic antibiotics in patients with diabetes. The purpose of the present study was to determine the efficacy of amoxicillin/metronidazole compared to clindamycin during non-surgical treatment of periodontitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Patients and methods In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, a total of 42 patients with chronic periodontitis and type 2 diabetes were included in a 24-months follow-up. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either amoxicillin/metronidazole or clindamycin every for 7 days. Clinical determinations (depth of probing, bleeding at the probe and plaque index) were performed to determine the extent and severity of periodontitis before and after the pharmacological treatment. The intra-group differences were calculated with Wilcoxon rank test. The inter-group differences were calculated with Mann-Whitney test. Sex, bacterial plaque, and bleed to the sounding were summarized using proportions and analyzed with the chi-square method. In all analyses, a P-value of <0.05 (two tailed) was considered statistically significant

详细描述

A parallel, randomized, double-blind, active controlled, single center clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy of two antibiotic therapies with 24-month follow-up. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Universitary Center of Health Sciences of University of Guadalajara and conducted according to Good Clinical Practice and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent before the initiation of study procedures.

A total of 5 non-study subjects with chronic periodontitis were recruited and used for the calibration exercise. Two designated examiners measured full-mouth probing pockets depths (PPD) for all 5 subjects. On the same day (with a minimum of 15 min separation), the examiner repeated the examination. Upon completion of all measurements, the intra-examiner repeatability for PPD measurement was assessed. The examiner was judged to be reproducible after fulfilling the pre-determined success criteria (the percentage of agreement within 2 mm between repeated measurements had to be at least 70 %). The examiner showed 78.3 % reproducibility.

The sample size was calculated with a 95% confidence level and statistical power of 80 %. A standard deviation of 1.0 mm with an expected difference of 1.0 mm probing pocket depth reduction between treatments. This resulted in a total of 14 patients per arm, however this sample was increased 20% (21 patients per group) to compensate for possible dropouts.

Patient population Criteria for selection Patients of both sexes (aged >18 to 70 years) with a diagnosis of chronic periodontitis according to the 1999 International World Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions and a history of type 2 diabetes with a HbA1C < 8 % and a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 180 mg/dL. Patients with aggressive periodontitis, pregnant or lactating females, required antibiotic pre-medication for the performance of periodontal examination and treatment or received antibiotic treatment in the previous 3 months were excluded. A history of anti-inflammatory therapy within preceding six months or that had received a course of periodontal treatment within the last 6 months, allergies to penicillin, metronidazole or clindamycin, and were not able to provide consent to participate in the study were also criteria for exclusion.

Intervention Subjects were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive 500 mg amoxicillin + 250 mg metronidazole or 300 mg clindamycin + placebo using a computer that generated a list of random numbers. Subjects were instructed to take the treatment three times a day for 7 days in both groups.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients of both sexes
  • Age >18 to 70 years
  • Diagnosis of chronic periodontitis according to the 1999 International World Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions
  • History of type 2 diabetes
  • HbA1C < 8 %
  • Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 180 mg/dL.

排除标准

  • Aggressive periodontitis
  • Pregnant or lactating females,
  • Required antibiotic pre-medication for the performance of periodontal examination and treatment or received antibiotic treatment in the previous 3 months were excluded.
  • A history of anti-inflammatory therapy within preceding six months
  • Had received a course of periodontal treatment within the last 6 months,
  • Allergies to penicillin, metronidazole or clindamycin,
  • Not able to provide consent to participate in the study

研究组 & 干预措施

AMX-MET

Active Comparator

AMX-MET Amoxicillin 500 mg + Metronidazole 250 mg. Capsules.

1 capsule tid during 7 days.

干预措施: Amoxicillin 500 mg / Metronidazole 250 mg (Drug)

Clindamycin

Experimental

Clindamycin Clindamycin 300 mg + placebo. Capsules.

1 capsule tid during 7 days.

干预措施: Clindamycin 300 mg (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Probing Depth

时间窗: 7 days

The size of the periodontal pocket

次要结局

  • Total Count of All Teeth Lost Across All Participants(2 years)
  • Sites With Plaques(7 days)
  • Sites With Bleeding on Probing(7 days)

研究者

发起方
Centro Universitario de Tonalá
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Arieh Roldán Mercado Sesma

Research professor associate B

Centro Universitario de Tonalá

相似试验