Comparison of Visual Field Assessments Between Three Perimeters
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Registration Number
- NCT06539715
- Lead Sponsor
- Gainesville Eye Associates
- Brief Summary
A single center, prospective, randomized, comparative study of visual field assessments between the TEMPO, VisuALL, and HFA perimeters. Subjects will be assessed at 1 visit. Clinical evaluations will include MD, PSD, FT, VFI, OCT, and a questionnaire.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 54
Inclusion Criteria
- Adult patients with best-corrected visual outcomes of 20/30 or better.
Exclusion Criteria
- Unable to tolerate ophthalmic imaging
- Any ocular or systemic conditions, that could affect VF test results, such as age-related macular degeneration, peripheral retinal disease, or severe glaucoma.
The principal investigator reserves the right to declare a patient ineligible or non-evaluable based on medical evidence that indicates they are unsuitable for the trial.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total acquisition time (both eyes) Visit 1 (Day 0)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pattern standard deviation (PSD) Visit 1 (Day 0) PSD is a measure of visual field irregularity.
Foveal threshold (FT) Visit 1 (Day 0) FT provides an estimate for best-corrected visual acuity.
Mean deviation (MD) Visit 1 (Day 0) Patient questionnaire Visit 1 (Day 0) A series of 9 Likert style questions (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) to assess comfort, ease of use, and anxiety with each device.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
North Georgia Eye Associates
🇺🇸Gainesville, Georgia, United States
North Georgia Eye Associates🇺🇸Gainesville, Georgia, United States