Evaluating the Ability of Electronic Patient Symptom Reporting to Reduce Symptom Burden During Hospitalization for Intensive Chemotherapy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 76
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Average peak symptom burden in the intervention group versus the control group
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this randomized trial will evaluate whether providing clinicians with daily reports from a well-validated, standardized, patient-centered electronic symptom survey tool (PRO-CTCAE) improves symptom burden in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Adult inpatients at UNC undergoing high-dose chemotherapy for preparative chemotherapy prior to stem cell infusion. Participants will be randomized into one of two arms: (1) a control arm with standard of care daily clinician interviews or (2) standard of care plus daily electronic symptom surveys, the results of which will be sent to clinicians electronically.
详细描述
The primary objective of the study is to compare peak symptom burden between the two study arms (autologous transplant vs. allogeneic transplant). Peak symptom burden will also be compared between the two study arms within both subgroups of patients (myeloablative vs. reduced intensity conditioning). Secondary outcomes that will also be compared between the two arms include: changes in patient-reported quality of life, time to supportive care treatment changes, length of hospital stay, thirty day readmission rate after discharge, days alive and out of the hospital in the 100 days since admission, and overall survival. Additionally, measures of physical activity will be captured through physiological monitoring in order to explore associations with patient-reported symptom measures. Patient and clinician satisfaction will also be evaluated.
In this study, the investigators will use an electronic survey to assess 16 patient-reported symptoms to calculate a symptom score that may range from 0-61 each day. This symptom score represents the symptom burden for the patient on that particular day. Symptom burden is anticipated to peak between days 7 and 14, so the investigators will define peak symptom burden as the average of the symptom scores on days 7, 10 and 14. In both arms, symptoms will be assessed on these days in order to compare peak burden.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 75 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Verification of access to a functioning email account
- •>= 18 years of age
- •<= 75 years of age
- •Able to read in English
- •Assessed as competent based on discretion of study personnel
- •Willing and able to provide signed, informed consent
排除标准
- •Concurrent participation in LCCC1234
结局指标
主要结局
Average peak symptom burden in the intervention group versus the control group
时间窗: Measured by comparing the average PRO-CTCAE scores from Day+7, Day+10, and Day+14 in the intervention compared to the control group
Peak symptom burden is defined as the average symptom score on chemotherapy days+7, +10, and +14 (relative to transplant day 0) as measured by the PRO-CTCAE. There are 16 items on the PRO-CTCAE questionnaire. Fifteen items are worth 0-4 points each and one item is worth 0-1 point. This translates to a symptom score range of 0-61 per day, which will be averaged over the three days. The outcome is the comparison of average peak symptom burden scores between the two groups.
次要结局
未报告次要终点