MedPath

Decitabine + BUCY vs BUCY Conditioning Regimen for Myeloid Tumors Undergoing Allo-HSCT

Phase 2
Conditions
Myeloid Tumors
Conditioning
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04098653
Lead Sponsor
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Brief Summary

Recent studies have demonstrated that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) could be a valuable treatment choice for myeloid tumors, such as acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Unfortunately, some patients relapsed after allo-HSCT. In this prospective randomized controlled study, the safety and efficacy of Decitabine + BUCY and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in myeloid tumors undergoing allo-HSCT are evaluated.

Detailed Description

Recent studies have demonstrated that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) could be a valuable treatment choice for myeloid tumors, such as acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. BUCY conditioning regimen is the standard myeloablative regimen for myeloid tumors undergoing allo-HSCT. However, it appears to have higher relapse rate and lower survival. To reduce the relapse rate and improve the survival, decitabine is added in the conditioning regimen. In this prospective randomized controlled study, the safety and efficacy of Decitabine + BUCY and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in myeloid tumors undergoing allo-HSCT are evaluated.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
196
Inclusion Criteria
  • Myeloid tumors undergoing allo-HSCT
  • 14-65 years
Exclusion Criteria
  • Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
  • Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Decitabine + BUCYCyclophosphamide (CY)For myeloid tumors undergoing allo-HSCT, Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 and -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
BUCYCyclophosphamide (CY)For myeloid tumors undergoing allo-HSCT, BUCY conditioning regimen was Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
Decitabine + BUCYDecitabineFor myeloid tumors undergoing allo-HSCT, Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 and -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
BUCYBusulfan (BU)For myeloid tumors undergoing allo-HSCT, BUCY conditioning regimen was Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
Decitabine + BUCYBusulfan (BU)For myeloid tumors undergoing allo-HSCT, Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 and -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
relapse rate1 year
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
overall survival (OS)1 year
disease-free survival (DFS)1 year
transplant-related mortality (TRM)1 year

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

🇨🇳

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath