MedPath

APHP Plateform of Normothermic Perfusion for Rehabilitation of Hepatic Grafts

Not Applicable
Conditions
Liver Diseases
Interventions
Procedure: Liver transplantation of a graft after assessment by normothermic perfusion
Registration Number
NCT04154696
Lead Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Brief Summary

This study aimed to evaluate fatty liver grafts, considered as unsuitable for upfront liver transplantation, by using normothermic perfusion. Grafts have to be allocated to one of 3 liver transplantation centres of Paris. After evidence of viability while on perfusion, these grafts will be transplanted to recipients with an estimated waiting time \> 6 months.

Detailed Description

In this study, the coordinator investigator proposes to build a platform for perfusing in normothermic conditions all grafts with histologically proven macrosteatosis ≥ 30% that will be considered as unsuitable for upfront LT. These grafts have to be alloacted to one of the 3 liver transplantation centers of Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris. Eligible grafts (macrosteatosis ≥ 30%, no severe fibrosis or cirrhosis) will be shipped to the platform for normothermic perfusion. Perfusion will be started provided that cold ischemia time do not exceed 8 hours. Parameters of grafts viability (lactates, bile production, flow) will be monitored. After a minimum of 4 hours of normothermic perfusion (not exceeding 16 hours), grafts fulfilling strict criteria (homogeneous aspect of the liver without any necrotic regions, lactates \< 2.5 mmol/l and continuous production of bile with at least one of the following criteria: pH of perfusate \> 7.3, arterial flow \> 150 ml/min and portal flow \> 500 ml/min, homogeneous perfusion of the graft) will be considered suitable for transplantation. Recipient will be transferred to the operating room, and first phase of LT (i.e, laparotomy and total hepatectomy) will be started. Simultaneously, grafts will be shipped to the center of initial allocation. Perfusion will be pursued during the transport from the platform to the recipient. Recipients (≥18 years and ≤ 70 years) have to be enlisted for LT with an estimated waiting time \> 6 months (i.e., MELD score \< 25) and who signed an informed consent.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients enlisted for liver transplantation for liver disease or HCC (AFP score≤ 2);
  • Ongoing cotraception in women of reproductive age ;
  • Patient with social security ;
  • informed signed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • Extra-hepatic tumor disease;
  • Re-transplantation ;
  • Pregnancy or brest-feeding;
  • Patients participting in another study;
  • Patients under psychiatric treatment;
  • Patients under tutorship or curatorship
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Normothermic perfusion of a graftLiver transplantation of a graft after assessment by normothermic perfusion-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To determine the proportion of grafts that can be transplanted after evaluation by normothermic perfusion (Hypothesis 50%) with a 3-year graft survival ≥ 90%3 months

Graft survival

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of grafts perfused36 months

Proportion of grafts perfused

Proportion of grafts that were transplanted after perfusion36 months

Proportion of grafts that were transplanted after perfusion

One -year graft survivalone year

One -year graft survival

Proportions of grafts transplanted after normotheric perfusion wthout early allograft dysfunction (according to Olthoff definition)one month

Proportions of grafts transplanted after normotheric perfusion wthout early allograft dysfunction (according to Olthoff definition)

One-month overall survival (without retransplantation or graft dysfunction)one month

One-month overall survival (without retransplantation or graft dysfunction)

Proportion of hepatic grafts allocated to the 3 transplant centres of Paris and considered as initially not transplantable during the study period36 months

Proportion of hepatic grafts allocated to the 3 transplant centres of Paris and considered as initially not transplantable during the study period

Comparison of 3-months graft survival with a control group of graft considered as initially transplantable3 months

Comparison of 3-months graft survival with a control group of graft considered as initially transplantable

Waiting time between the two groups36 months
Incidence of biliary stenosis (anastomotic or non anastomotic) defined by cholangio MRI at one year12 months

Incidence of biliary stenosis (anastomotic or non anastomotic) defined by cholangio MRI at one year

Proportion of fatty grafts allocated to the 3 transplant centres of Paris and considered as initially not transplantable during the study period eligible for normothermic perfusion36 months

Proportion of fatty grafts allocated to the 3 transplant centres of Paris and considered as initially not transplantable during the study period eligible for normothermic perfusion

Time interval until liver function recovery while on normothermic perfusion (according to viability criteria defined above)15 hours

Time interval until liver function recovery while on normothermic perfusion (according to viability criteria defined above)

Time interval until liver function recovery after transplantationone day

Time interval until liver function recovery after transplantation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

AP-HP, Paul Brousse Hospital

🇫🇷

Villejuif, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath