跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2018/03/012652
CTRI/2018/03/012652已完成未知

Comparative study of the use of External Oblique Aponeurosis for strengthening of posterior wall of Inguinal Canal (no mesh Desardas technique) vs standard hernia repair with mesh (Lichtensteins repair).

orth Parganas district hospital0 个研究点目标入组 152 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
152

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • All cases of inguinal hernia admitted for surgery with a primary, reducible inguinal or inguino-scrotal hernia; unilateral or bilateral.

排除标准

  • Obstructive uropathy or chronic obstructive lung diseases- are contraindicated for elective hernia surgery. They are associated high hernia recurrence rates.
  • Old and debilitated patients of poor general condition will not be able to give an accurate assessment of the key outcomes of the operation.
  • Patients with strangulated inguinal hernias.
  • Recurrent inguinal hernias.
  • On table operative finding of separated, thin and/or weak external oblique aponeurosis.
  • Giant inguinal hernias.
  • Those who refuse to participate in the study.

研究者

发起方
orth Parganas district hospital

相似试验