Phantom Motor Execution Via MPR, VR/AR, and SG, as a Treatment of PLP
- Conditions
- Phantom Limb Pain
- Registration Number
- NCT03112928
- Lead Sponsor
- Integrum
- Brief Summary
This international, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of Phantom Motor Execution (PME) and Phantom Motor Imagery (PMI) as treatments of Phantom Limb Pain (PLP). In PME, myoelectric pattern recognition (MPR) is used to predict motor volition and then use the decoded movements to control virtual and augmented reality environments (VR/AR), along with serious gaming (SG). The same device and VR/AR environments are used in PMI with the difference that subjects will imagine rather than execute phantom movements. Electromyography is used to monitor for no muscular activity in PMI.
- Detailed Description
Sixty-six subjects with upper or lower limb amputations are planned to take part in this study. Subjects will be assigned randomly to PME and PMI treatments (2:1 proportion). After treatment completion (15 sessions of 2 hours each) and follow-up period of six months, patients that received PMI will be given the choice to receive PME. The design is double blinded as the patient will be informed that the treatment received, regardless of which, has been shown effective in previous studies. The person conducting the pain evaluations will be blinded to which treatment each patient receives, and will not take part on providing treatment (evaluator and therapist are different persons).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 77
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain Rating Index registered at the beginning (1st session) and at the end of the treatment (15th session). 28-40 weeks, depending on the frequency of the sessions. The Pain Rating Index (PRI) is calculated as the sum of 15 descriptors. At the end of each treatment session the descriptors are presented to the patient, who rates each of them with an intensity scale from 0 to 3. The PRI is therefore a number between 0 and 45: the higher the index the greater is the pain. The primary efficacy variable for this study is the change in PRI between the first and the last treatment session.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain Disability Index registered at the beginning (1st session) and the end of the treatment (15th session). 28-40 weeks, depending on the frequency of the sessions. The Pain Disability Index (PDI) measures the impact that pain has on the ability of a person to participate in essential life activities. The index is comprised between 0 and 70. The higher the index the greater the person's disability due to pain is. The secondary efficacy variable of this study is the change in PDI between the first and the last treatment session.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (9)
Shirley Ryan Ability Lab
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Institue of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick
🇨🇦Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr - University Bochum (RUB)
🇩🇪Bochum, Germany
School of Psychology, National University of Ireland
🇮🇪Galway, Connacht, Ireland
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
🇳🇱Groningen, Netherlands
University Rehabilitation Institute
🇸🇮Ljubljana, Slovenia
Ortopedteknik, Region Örebro län
🇸🇪Örebro, Närke, Sweden
Bräcke Diakoni
🇸🇪Stockholm, Uppland, Sweden
Gåskolan, Ortopedtekniska avdelningen
🇸🇪Göteborg, Västergötland, Sweden
Shirley Ryan Ability Lab🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States