Use of FemVue for Assessment of Tubal Patency as Compared to Laparoscopic Chromopertubation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 终止
- 入组人数
- 24
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Number of Subjects With Discordant Findings
研究概览
简要总结
A thorough infertility evaluation commonly involves determining whether a woman's fallopian tubes are patent. The two most often utilized methods of evaluating the fallopian tubes are hysterosalpingogram (taking an X-ray of the pelvis after injecting dye through the uterus and fallopian tubes) and laparoscopic chromopertubation (a surgical procedure in which dye is visualized passing through the fallopian tubes).
The FemVue Saline-Air device is a new method of assessing tubal patency. The device utilizes a mixture of saline and air bubbles that can be seen passing through the fallopian tubes by ultrasound. FemVue can be efficiently performed in a physician's office and is minimally invasive. Unlike hysterosalpingogram and laparoscopic chromopertubation, it does not carry the risks of anesthesia or surgery, and doesn't expose the patient to radiation or contrast. It does, like the other two methods, carry a small risk of infection.
This study will involve using the FemVue device on patients under anesthesia in the operating room before they undergo scheduled laparoscopic chromopertubation, the gold standard for evaluating tubal patency. The two methods will be compared to determine the accuracy of the FemVue device.
详细描述
Subjects who agree to participate will have their tubes evaluated by using the FemVue Saline-Air device and laparoscopic chromopertubation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 45 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Pts ages 18-45 undergoing planned diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation.
排除标准
- •Adnexal mass > 3.5cm or uterine size greater than 10 wks
结局指标
主要结局
Number of Subjects With Discordant Findings
时间窗: End of procedure, day 1.
When the findings between the FemVue and Laparoscopic Chromopertubation were discordant, efficacy of FemVue was determined with a third procedure, a Hysterosalpingogram. If the FemVue device found the tubes patent (open) and laparoscopic chromopertubation found them closed, the finding is considered discordant. To determine which finding is accurate a third procedure was performed which is a Hysteropsalpingogram, another way to determine tubal patency.
Number of Subjects Who Had Concordant Findings
时间窗: End of procedure, day 1.
When the findings using the device was the same as the procedure. In other words, if the device found tubes to be patent (open) and it was confirmed with the laparoscopic chromopertubation, the findings are said to be concordant the same as if the device found tubes to be blocked and the laparoscopic chromopertubation found the same.
次要结局
- The Time Frame in Which Patency of the Tubes Was Determined With the FemVue Device.(10 mins after start of procedure)
- Time Frame in Which Patency of the Tubes Was Determined by Laparoscopic Chrompertubation.(End of procedure, Day 1)