跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03029169
NCT03029169已完成4 期

Prospective Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety of 1c Class Antiarrhythmic Agent (Propafenone) in Septic Shock

Charles University, Czech Republic2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 210 人开始时间: 2017年10月23日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
210
试验地点
2
主要终点
Efficacy of propafenone

研究概览

简要总结

Arrhythmias accompany septic shock in increased rates than in other ICU cohorts and their presence and management are related to patient´s prognosis. 1c class antiarrhythmics are seldom administered in intensive care due to a dose dependent toxicity published in case reports and unfavourable outcome reported in a few prospective trials done on cardiology patients. The papers on 1c class antiarrhythmics do not take into consideration a complex haemodynamic assessment using echocardiography. The authors have recently presented a retrospective study on SV arrhythmias in septic shock patients demonstrating favourable effect and safety of propafenone which showed higher antiarrhythmic efficacy than amiodarone.

详细描述

Primary aim is to verify the conclusions of the retrospective study, i.e. efficacy and safety of propafenone, in a prospective blinded randomized trial performed in two large intensive care units. Secondary aims are to monitor the electromechanics of left atrium in patients with SV arrhythmias in septic shock.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Investigator)

盲法说明

Provided by a dedicated study nurse

入排标准

年龄范围
16 Years 至 90 Years(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Septic shock with a new onset SV arrhythmia
  • LV systolic function normal to moderately reduced according to echocardiography.

排除标准

  • Severe LV systolic dysfunction
  • More than 1st degree AV block
  • High dose vasopressor therapy with continuous noradrenaline > 1.0 ug/kg.min
  • Known intolerance to amiodarone or propafenone
  • Absence of septic shock
  • Chronic AF
  • Dependence on pacemaker
  • Status after MAZE procedure

研究组 & 干预措施

Propafenone i.v.

Active Comparator

Patients in septic shock with a new onset supraventricular arrhythmia are randomized either to arm treated with propafenone or with amiodarone. Both arms will have standard treatment, there are no limits to indicated electric cardioversion as part of treatment.

Intervention: Bolus of 35-70 mg intravenous propafenone followed by continuous infusion of 400-840 mg/24h.

干预措施: Propafenone i.v. (Drug)

Amiodarone i.v.

Active Comparator

Patients in septic shock with a new onset supraventricular arrhythmia are randomized either to arm treated with propafenone or with amiodarone. Both arms will have standard treatment, there are no limits to indicated electric cardioversion as part of treatment.

Intervention: Bolus of 150-300 mg of intravenous amiodarone followed by continuous infusion of 600-1800 mg/24h.

干预措施: Amiodarone i.v. (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Efficacy of propafenone

时间窗: 1 year

cardioversion rate

ICU mortality of septic shock patients on propafenone for a SV arrhythmia

时间窗: 1 year

ICU mortality

28-day mortality of septic shock patients on propafenone for a SV arrhythmia

时间窗: 2 years

28-day mortality

12-month mortality of septic shock patients on propafenone for a SV arrhythmia

时间窗: 2 years

12-month mortality

次要结局

  • Electromechanics of left atrium(1 year)
  • Electromechanics of LA(1 year)

研究者

发起方
Charles University, Czech Republic
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Martin Balik

A/Prof, MD, PhD

Charles University, Czech Republic

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验