MedPath

Atrial Sensing Capability for Better Detection of Atrial Fibrillation

Not Applicable
Conditions
Cardiac Arrhythmia
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Atrial Fibrillation
Cardiac Event
Interventions
Device: Atrial sensing On mode
Registration Number
NCT03932604
Lead Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center
Brief Summary

This prospective multi-center randomized controlled study aims to compare atrial fibrillation detection and inappropriate therapy according to activation of atrial sensing capability in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Detailed Description

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators(ICD) therapy has been shown to reduce sudden cardiac death and improve survival in cardiac arrest survivors as well as in heart failure patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly found in ICD implantation patients up to 50%. AF is an independent predictor of mortality, inappropriate shock, and embolic events. Therefore, early detection of AF in patients with ICD is essential for improving the quality of life and overall prognosis of the patients.

Conventional ICDs consist of a single chamber (SC) ICD with a lead only in the right ventricle (RV) and dual chamber (DC) ICD with each lead in the right atrium (RA) and RV. SC ICD has the advantage of shorter procedure time, lower cost compared to DC ICD. In contrast, DC ICD has the advantage of being able to monitor atrial arrhythmic events, but complication rates were higher and additional cost and longer procedure time are usually required than SC ICD. Sixty percent of ICD implantation patients who have are SC ICD Recently, a unique ICD lead with atrial sensing ring capable of monitoring the atrial electrical signals has been developed \[Intica 7 VR-T DX ICD (Biotronik., Germany)\]. Therefore, turning off the atrial sensing function makes it functionally the same as SC ICD whereas turning on makes it function similar to DC ICD without additional cost and procedure time.

Therefore, Detection of AF could be made earlier with VDD ICD versus conventional SC ICD without atrial sensing capability, providing a better chance to improve the prognosis of ICD patients. However, no study exists which shows whether VDD ICD is better for detecting atrial tachyarrhythmia than conventional SC ICD. Therefore, we designed a multicenter prospective randomized study comparing the AF diagnostic efficacy of VDD ICD (with atrial sensing 'ON') against conventional SC ICD. As the second phase, we also plan to compare inappropriate therapy rate according to atrial sensing status of VDD ICD.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
640
Inclusion Criteria
  1. age ≄ 19 years
  2. indication for ICD implantation according to guidelines
  3. atrial fibrillation didn't detect by electrocardiogram or Holter test within the past 1 year from the ICD implantation, and
  4. CHA2DS2VASc score ≄1 point in male or ≄ 2 in female
Exclusion Criteria
  1. persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation (AF)
  2. atrial fibrillation detected by electrocardiogram or Holter test within the past 1 year from the ICD implantation
  3. history of the catheter or surgical ablation of AF or taking antiarrhythmic drug
  4. scheduled to undergo heart transplant within 1 year
  5. life expectancy < 1 year
  6. requiring atrial pacing

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Atrial sensing ON modeAtrial sensing On modeVDD-ICD programmed as atrial sensing ON mode
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Atrial fibrillationfrom enrollment to last follow-up (2 years)

cardiac implantable electronic device-detected or clinical atrial fibrillation

Inappropriate device therapyfrom enrollment to last follow-up (2 years)

inappropriate ATP or shock

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
atrial lead sensing stabilityfrom enrollment to last follow-up (2 years)

Atrioventricular synchrony ratio

Number of Participants with ventricular arrhythmiafrom enrollment to last follow-up (2 years)

cardiac implantable electronic device-detected or clinical ventricular arrhythmia

Number of Participants with complications associated with atrial fibrillationfrom enrollment to last follow-up (2 years)

thromboembolic events, heart failure

Number of Participants with major adverse composite eventsfrom enrollment to last follow-up (2 years)

cardiac death, all cuase death, stroke, atrial fibrillation or flutter, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, hospitalization for heart failure

Trial Locations

Locations (28)

Daegu Catholic University Medical Center

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Daegu, Korea, Republic of

National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Goyang, Korea, Republic of

Inha University Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Incheon, Korea, Republic of

Kangwon National University Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Chuncheon, Korea, Republic of

Gachon University, Donginchoen Gil Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Incheon, Korea, Republic of

Mediplex Sejong Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Incheon, Korea, Republic of

Chungnam National University Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Daejeon, Korea, Republic of

Pusan National University Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Pusan, Korea, Republic of

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Daegu, Korea, Republic of

Yeongnam University Medical Center

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Daegu, Korea, Republic of

Chungbuk National University Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Cheongju, Korea, Republic of

Kyungpook National University Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Daegu, Korea, Republic of

Samsung Changwon Medical Center

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Changwon, Korea, Republic of

Seoul National University Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Suwon, Korea, Republic of

Sejong General Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Bucheon, Korea, Republic of

Inje University Busan Paik Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Busan, Korea, Republic of

GangNeung Asan Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Gangneung, Korea, Republic of

Kosin University Gospel Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Pusan, Korea, Republic of

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Seongnam, Korea, Republic of

Hallym University Medical Center-Kangnam

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Koera University Guro Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

VHS Medical Center

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Ajou University Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Suwon, Korea, Republic of

Kyung Hee University Hospital

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Ā© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath