跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04600830
NCT04600830已完成不适用

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Dry Needling Against Foam Roller in the Short Term, Healthy Athletes With Reduced Mobility of the Ankle Joint

Fundación Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 45 人开始时间: 2020年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
45
试验地点
2
主要终点
Range of motion (ROM)

研究概览

简要总结

To compare the effects of dry needling and Foam roller in myofascial trigger points. Needling has been shown to decrease pain in the short term; however, its effects on muscle force production are unclear. There are differences between dry needling and foam roller after treatment?

详细描述

Background: It has been shown that the decrease of the range of motion in the ankle, due to the presence of latent trigger points in the gastro-sole complex, can affect performance, as well as being a predisposing factor to injury. Objective: To compare the effects of Dry Needling and Foam roller in healthy athletes with limited dorsal ankle flexion by the presence of latent trigger points. Material and methods: This is a clinical trial, single-blind experimental study. The sample will have a total of 44 students, volunteers, healthy of the degree of physiotherapy of the the investigator's university (UCV). Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned in two groups: Group 1 or Dry Needling (N = 22) and Group 2 or Foam Roller (N = 22). The range of motion of ankle will be assessed through the Leg Motion system (Check Your Motion®, Albacete, Spain). Assessed thought Ankle Test (post-intervention and 24 hours later). The reference values to consider the decreased ankle ROM will be <11.5 cm, <35º measured with Easy Angle® digital goniometer (Meloq AB, Sweden) and/or if it has a difference of 1.5 cm between both extremities. Thus, the effect on previous activity performance will be assessed thought the Counter Movement Jump. Data analysis: Once the distribution of the sample is determined, a descriptive analysis of the data will be carried out and an ANOVA of repeated measures. Will be used to compare the data found in the two groups that make up the study taking into account a 95% CI and an error less than 0.05.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

盲法说明

A simple blind masking will be carried out to reduce biases in the interpretation of the results. The researchers responsible for the observation, measurement of the ankle ROM and Counter Movement Jump, will not be informed of the treatment performed at the time of immediate post-treatment and post-treatment at 24 hours.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Students of physiotherapy degree of the university
  • All participants who present restriction on active ankle dorsiflexion (<35º).
  • They must be diagnosed through manual therapy of latent PG in the gastro-soleus complex.

排除标准

  • Subjects suffering from belonephobia
  • Pathology of connective tissue
  • Coagulation problems
  • Lymphatic disorders
  • Surgical history in the lower limb (last 12 months)
  • Prior treatment with dry needling (last 6 months)

结局指标

主要结局

Range of motion (ROM)

时间窗: 48 hours

Range of motion (ROM) is a key measurement to help in detecting and diagnosing musculoskeletal deficits, monitoring treatment progression, and guiding the treatment plan. Measurement of ROM is a relevant point and an important item of the joint evaluation process when using any ankle scoring system as part of the ankle and ankle joint evaluation. ROM of ankle joint in load PRE, POST treatment and POST 24 hours after of intervention.

次要结局

  • Lunge / Ankle Test Test(48 hours)
  • Counter Movement Jump (CMJ)(48 hours)

研究者

发起方
Fundación Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验