跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01141413
NCT01141413已完成不适用

Comparison of Dosing and Costs Between Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With Remicade® Versus Orencia®

Bristol-Myers Squibb0 个研究点目标入组 5,451 人开始时间: 2010年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
5,451
主要终点
Escalation in dosing amount or frequency

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to describe infliximab and abatacept dosing patterns (i.e., dosing amount and frequency) and costs among a population of managed care enrollees with RA. This study will also identify changes in infliximab and abatacept dosing over time and the implication these changes may have on the costs of medication administration.

详细描述

This study will be conducted in two parts. The primary analysis is a longitudinal analysis, where patients' health care claims from a period during which the patient was continuously enrolled in the health plan will be used to evaluate the primary outcome (i.e., dose escalation). The second analysis will be cross-sectional, where patients' health care claims from a fixed period of time (i.e., 2008) will be used to examine health care cost.

The final enrollment for the longitudinal portion of the study was 2,001 (1,306 infliximab and 695 abatacept patients). Final enrollment for the cross-sectional portion was 3,450 (2,646 infliximab and 806 abatacept patients). There may be some overlap in these numbers.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Commercial health plan enrollees with medical and pharmacy coverage
  • At least 3 claims on separate days for infliximab (HCPCS J1745) or abatacept (HCPCS C9230, J0129, J3590) administration during the subject identification period
  • The 3 initial claims for abatacept occurred within a 6-week period inclusive of the index date and the three initial claims for infliximab occur within a 9-week period inclusive of the index date
  • Presence of a diagnosis of RA (ICD-9-CM 714.xx)
  • Continuous enrollment during the baseline and follow-up periods
  • At least 18 years of age or older on the index date

排除标准

  • Prior exposure to the index medication during the baseline period
  • Diagnosis of psoriasis (ICD-9-CM 696.1), psoriatic arthritis (696.0), ankylosing spondylitis (720.0), Crohn's disease (555.x), or ulcerative colitis (556.x) in any position at any time during the study period
  • Exposure to alefacept (HCPCS J0215, C9211, C9212) or efalizumab (HCPCS S0162) at any time during the study period

结局指标

主要结局

Escalation in dosing amount or frequency

时间窗: Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months)

次要结局

  • Switch/discontinuation of index therapy(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))
  • Number of infusions(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))
  • Average dose per infusion(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))
  • Frequency of infusions(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))
  • Average costs per infusion(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))
  • Health care resource utilization(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))
  • Health care costs(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))
  • Concurrent medication use(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))
  • Time to maximum dose(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))
  • Time to dose escalation(Throughout follow-up period (variable, between 6 weeks and 39 months))

研究者

发起方
Bristol-Myers Squibb
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验

已完成
2 期
A Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients to Compare Two Formulations of Adalimumab for Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and SafetyRheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01712178AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)100
已完成
3 期
Abatacept and Infliximab in Combination With Methotrexate in Subjects With Rheumatoid ArthritisRheumatoid Arthritis
NCT00095147Bristol-Myers Squibb431
尚未招募
不适用
The cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab or anti-TNF alpha for patients with rheumatoid arthritisrheumatoid arthritis
NL-OMON32522niversitair Medisch Centrum Sint Radboud261
进行中(未招募)
不适用
The cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab or anti-TNF alpha for patients with rheumatoid artritis. - Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) Targetted Immune Modulator Evaluation (TIME)MedDRA version: 12.0Level: PTClassification code 10039073Term: Rheumatoid arthritisRheumatoid arthritis
EUCTR2008-005450-20-BERadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, department of Rheumatic Diseases261
招募中
不适用
(English) Cost-effectiveness of new medicines (Mabthera and Orencia) compared to a second TNF blocking medicine, for patients with inadequate effect of a first TNF blocking medicine. (Dutch)Onderzoek naar de kosteneffectiviteit van nieuwe medicijnen (Mabthera en Orencia) vergeleken met een tweede TNF blokerend middel, voor patienten met onvoldoende effect van een eerste behandeling met TNF blokkerende middelen.Rheumatoid Arthritis, Reumatoïde Artritis, cost-effectiveness, kosteneffectiviteit, doelmatigheid, daily clinical practice, dagelijkse klinische praktijk, biologicals, biologics, Targeted Immune Modulators, Rituximab, Abatacept, Adalimumab, Etanercept, Infliximab.
NL-OMON26753Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Sint Radboud132