MedPath

Enhancing Clinical Reasoning Competency

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Clinical Reasoning
Communication
Development, Human
Interventions
Other: virtual simulation-based education program
Registration Number
NCT06373172
Lead Sponsor
Tongmyong University
Brief Summary

Enhancing Clinical Reasoning Competency for Undergraduate Nursing Students Using Virtual Simulation-based Education based on the Rasch model

Aims: Clinical reasoning is a core nursing competency that involves analyzing patient-related data and providing appropriate nursing practices. Simulation-based education is effective in improving the clinical reasoning competencies and communication skills of nursing students. This study aimed to verify the effectiveness of virtual simulation-based education.

Detailed Description

Methods: This study used a single-group pre- and post-test experimental design to verify the effectiveness of virtual simulation-based education. Data were collected from June to September 2020. Thirty-six nursing students in the 3rd and 4th grades who understood the purpose of this study were selected as participants. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics 25.0 and Winsteps 3.68.2.

Keywords: Clinical Reasoning, Competency, Communication, Nursing, Virtual Simulation

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
37
Inclusion Criteria
  • The participants were third- and fourth-year undergraduate nursing students who understood the purpose of the study and voluntarily agreed to participate
Exclusion Criteria
  • A person who has difficulty communicating or has no willingness to participate

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Enhancing Clinical Reasoning Competency for Undergraduate Nursing Studentsvirtual simulation-based education programEnhancing Clinical Reasoning Competency for Undergraduate Nursing Students Using Virtual Simulation-based Education based on the Rasch model
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale4month

The Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale (NCRS) includes 15 items rated on a five-point Likert scale (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree, min:15 \& max:75) (Liou et al., 2016). We used the Korean version of the NCRS in this study (Joung \& Han, 2017). Higher scores indicated better clinical reasoning. Cronbach's α was 0.94 for the original NCRS, and 0.93 for the Korean version of the NCRS.

Communication Skills Scale4month

The Global Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale (GICC-15) includes 15 items rated on a five-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree. min:15 \& max:75) (Rubin \& Martin, 1994). We used the Korean version of the GICC-15 (Hur, 2003). Cronbach's α in Hur's (2003) study was 0.72.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Tongmyong Unoversity

🇰🇷

Busan, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath