Comparison of Burch Colposuspension and Mid-urethral Sling Operations for Stress Urinary Incontinence
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Incontinence
- Sponsor
- Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
- Enrollment
- 50
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- recurrence
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Stress urinary incontinence is common in women. the treatment of this condition is surgery. investigators add stress incontinence surgery to patients who undergo total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign reasons.
Depending on the patient's general condition and indications, the operation can be performed by vaginal approach, as well as mid-urethral sling operations and laparoscopic burch colposuspension.
The researchers aimed to compare these two types of operations performed on patients. In this way, the superiority and disadvantage of each other in two procedures will be demonstrated.
Investigators
Pınar Kadirogulları
pınar kadiroğulları M.D, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •A total laparoscopic hysterectomy was planned for benign causes,
- •Patients scheduled for simultaneous operation for incontinence
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients previously operated for urinary incontinence
- •Patients whose diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence is uncertain
- •Patients with urinary tract infection
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
recurrence
Time Frame: 2 years
in patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy and simultaneous incontinence surgery for benign reasons; In the early postoperative period, relapse will be evaluated at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months.