JPRN-UMIN000044525
Completed
未知
Differences in flexibility improvement between Foot tape and standard stretching : A randomized controlled trial with a non-inferiority/equivalence trial design - Differences in flexibility improvement between Foot tape and standard stretching : A randomized controlled trial with a non-inferiority/equivalence trial design
ConditionsHealthy university students
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Healthy university students
- Sponsor
- International University of health and welfare
- Enrollment
- 64
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- •Exclusion criteria shall be as follows (1\) Lower extremity injury in the past 6 weeks (2\) Lumbar spine lesions in the past 6 weeks (e.g., known lumbar lesions that limit ROM, previous lumbar spine surgery, lumbar spine lesions including known lumbosacral spine physical impairment that limits ROM and function) (3\) Lower extremity surgery within the past 6 months or major ligamentous surgery within the past year
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
Evaluation of Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol for In vitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary SyndromeIRCT20091018002604N6Yazd University of Medical Sciences150
Completed
Not Applicable
The relationship between being psychologically flexible and the quality of professional life among doctorsCTRI/2019/09/021253Anjana P Ravichandran185
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Effects of individual flexibility difference on the efficacy of static stretchingJPRN-UMIN000048928agoya University150
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Back muscle activity in low back pain patientsHealth Condition 1: M539- Dorsopathy, unspecifiedCTRI/2020/03/024010Shetty Shrija Jaya
Recruiting
Not Applicable
To check the effect of high heeled footwear and flat footwear on the activity of back muscle in normal female individualsCTRI/2019/08/020587Savadi Madhura Vijay