Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)
- Conditions
- Treatment Resistant DepressionDepression, BipolarDepressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
- Registration Number
- NCT01898429
- Lead Sponsor
- Paul Holtzheimer
- Brief Summary
In this pilot study, we propose to test whether high frequency stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate (SCC) is a safe and efficacious antidepressant treatment in five TRD patients, to compare the effects of left-sided vs. right-sided stimulation, and to investigate potential mechanisms of action of this intervention. Importantly, this study will be used to assess the need for and assist in planning a larger, more definitive trial of SCC DBS for TRD.
- Detailed Description
The U.S. lifetime prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) is 17%. A number of treatments are available for depression including medications, psychotherapy and various somatic treatments. Unfortunately, up to two-thirds of patients remain symptomatic following first-line treatment and a third fail to achieve remission (defined as full resolution of depressive symptoms) after four established treatments; approximately 10%-20% of depressed patients may show virtually no improvement despite multiple, often aggressive treatments. Thus, a conservative estimate places the U.S. prevalence of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) at 1%-3%. TRD has a high risk of suicide, is a major cause of disability and is responsible for doubling of overall health care costs.
For patients with TRD there are limited evidence-based treatment options. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may have efficacy for patients that have failed no more than one antidepressant medication 10-12, but response and remission rates are relatively low (under 30% and 20% respectively). Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may have efficacy in patients that have failed 4-6 antidepressant treatments but long-term response and remission rates are again low (about 20% and 10% respectively). Electroconvulsive therapy(ECT) can be effective in TRD patients with remission rates of 50%-60%. However, more than 70% of TRD patients will relapse within 6 months following a successful acute treatment course. For patients that have failed ECT, there are no evidence-based treatment options. Therefore, there is great need for novel treatment approaches for TRD.
Prior clinical trials have shown that SCC DBS has the potential to be a valuable treatment option for patients with TRD. Further developing this treatment will involve confirming its effectiveness and identifying ways to optimize its use. In this study we intend to test the safety and efficacy of chronic SCC DBS as a treatment for TRD and compare the safety and efficacy of left-sided versus right-sided stimulation using a double-blind, randomized, cross-over design.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 5
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of 12 Weeks of Left Unilateral DBS vs. 12 Weeks Right Unilateral DBS on Change in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) baseline, 12 weeks of phase 1, 12 weeks of phase 2 and 12 weeks of phase 3 (bilateral stimulation) Baseline HDRS-17 is defined as the average of 4 weekly HDRS-17 in the 4 weeks leading up to surgery. Change in HDRS-17 after 12 weeks of left-sided stimulation (compared to baseline) will be compared to change in HDRS-17 after 12 weeks of right-sided stimulation (compared to baseline). The scale ranges from 0-48 with higher scored indicating more severe depression. A cutoff of 7 or below is considered remission from depression. A decrease of at least 50% from baseline is considered an antidepressant response.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
🇺🇸Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center🇺🇸Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States